Expansion Cargo Line Volume 6: Gas Feedback Thread

Discussion in 'Expansion / Gameplay Pack Feedback' started by dtg_jan, Jul 14, 2026 at 2:29 PM.

  1. dtg_jan

    dtg_jan Community Manager Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2023
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    5,009
    Hello folks,

    This is the official master feedback thread for the Cargo Line Volume 6: Gas AddOn.

    Please keep all discussions only related to feedback, and provide the game platform you are using in any comments. Thank you!

    When providing feedback, please always add the following details if possible:
    • Platform (i.e.: PC, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S)
    • Service/Scenario played when the issue occurred.
    • Repeatability. How often does this issue occur?
    • Images/Videos of the issue occurring.
    As always, thank you for your feedback.

    All the best,
    Jan
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2026 at 4:03 PM
    • Like Like x 2
  2. dal#7945

    dal#7945 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2024
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    3,192
    Thrid job in journey mode chapter one. Train is to heavy for one loco. You get stopped by a red signal at neustadt and you cant pull from station feels like train is too heavy. Xbox series x
     
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2026 at 4:21 PM
    • Like Like x 1
  3. dtg_jan

    dtg_jan Community Manager Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2023
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    5,009
    Hey dal, thank you for your report. Please remember to always add which platform you're encountering this issue on. The more information you add, the more helpful it is.
    Thank you.
     
  4. jesper2805

    jesper2805 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2025
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    Did you run with active AFB? Yes? Turn that off and you will have more power to accelerate. If im correct this is a bug when you use the BR185
     
  5. dal#7945

    dal#7945 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2024
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    3,192
    I did have it on then I switched it off and still could not move it.
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  6. jesper2805

    jesper2805 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2025
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    Okay strange then..... How many wagons did the train have?
     
  7. dal#7945

    dal#7945 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2024
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    3,192
    26 wagons. But have done it now using vectron and no problems. But did struggle in places.
     
  8. SR89

    SR89 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    5
    It seems there's an issue with the emergency break kicking in by passing the signal at Ludwigshafen Mitte in direction toward Ludwigshafen Hbf for absolute no reason. The signal was indicating a clear and speed was a couple of km/h below v/max (80 km/h). There's also an issue in which the 500Hz indicator doesn't light up approaching the stop signal in Schifferstadt. In addition to the above: the wrong pantograph is raised in Mannheim Hbf. Since the cars seem to be loaded, the leading panto needs to be raised. One another bit: If I'm right an the train consists of loaded cars, the v/max should be 100 km/h, not 120 km/h as is indicated. Besides all that I enjoyed the amount of AI traffic during this run. The above described issues are reproducible.
    Session name: [CL] GC 59005 Mannheim Rbf - Tanklager Speyer; running on PC/Steam.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  9. iriv#7314

    iriv#7314 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2021
    Messages:
    566
    Likes Received:
    476
    I just experienced a zwangsbremsung at the magnet of the bü signal (was blinking, so crossing safe) instead of at the vorsignal a few hundred meters further.
    Hauptsignal was red because of a train in the station

    platform steam, cargo line gas
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. keysevenseven

    keysevenseven New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    18
    I really like all the route traffic on the runs in this pack
     
  11. OpenMinded

    OpenMinded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2021
    Messages:
    1,460
    Likes Received:
    2,539
    I really like the pack! Visually probably one of the best. Also like the fact that most of the physics are simulated to a reasonable depth (ie brake mode selector working, manual load change, etc). Timetable seems quite busy as well (Services to Kaiserslautern use alternate routes sometimes, as I have noticed)

    I have seen that the dev has already acknowledeg a couple of things over on discord, like the hand brake at the wrong location and several decals wrong.

    However, I have not seen anyone mentioning the suspicion that there may be something wrong with the weights. I was able to fairly easily pull a 1950 tonne train up the hills to Kaiserslautern using the Br145. I would not expect this to would work at all, tbh. The 145 is fairly weak and other trains, which are lighter, feel heavier (with other waggons, obviously) with this loco. It is only a feeling, of course, however, would like to hear a comment from the devs if this would be something they would be willing to investigate.

    The empty trains, which are below 800 tonnes, feel much more realistic, which makes me wonder if it is only the loaded state, that is off, in some way?!

    Anyway, apart from this (and I am happy to be told wrong) I am a fan of this DLC:cool:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. jesper2805

    jesper2805 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2025
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    About the weight is mentioned by dal#7945 and i found it questionable... There are some strange things with the weight.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  13. OpenMinded

    OpenMinded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2021
    Messages:
    1,460
    Likes Received:
    2,539
    Thanks for this, too many threads seem to confuse me… anyway, your message seems to contradict my observation, as I did not have any issues even with the 145. I even stopped and started moving again. However, it was dry while I was doing this…
     
  14. jesper2805

    jesper2805 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2025
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    I have no clue whats wrong here.... Maybe a more expert can give some Inside information about how weights are setup in TSW. For me freight is not very realistic in most non expert trains
     
  15. Disintegration7

    Disintegration7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,820
    Likes Received:
    6,982
    Anybody have a list of the new services on Mannheim?

    I count 3 pairs of short runs to and from Tanklager Speyer, which should leave another 8 somewhere.

    Hoping for at least a few longer drives
     
  16. dal#7945

    dal#7945 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2024
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    3,192
    There are few long runs im not sure if you have to use the the 185 to see them all.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Disintegration7

    Disintegration7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,820
    Likes Received:
    6,982
    Thanks i'll take a look comparing between this timetable and the expert 101 timetable.

    Original service count for the 185 was 66, and now it's 80, and , good news, it looks like you can use several locos with the new services. I'm also seeing 80 services for the Expert 145, 155, 182, 185.2, 185.5, 187, and the Vectron.
     
  18. dal#7945

    dal#7945 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2024
    Messages:
    4,706
    Likes Received:
    3,192
    The gas jobs do not layer on the expert timetable only the normal one.
     
  19. Disintegration7

    Disintegration7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,820
    Likes Received:
    6,982
    Right, that's why comparing the two should let me figure out what's new. I'll post the list once I have them all.
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  20. Disintegration7

    Disintegration7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,820
    Likes Received:
    6,982
    Ok here's what I have as new on the CL6 timetable:

    GC 56620 @ 06:02
    GC 59120 @ 07:58
    GC 59115 @ 08:04- confirmed as i played it
    GC 59877 @ 08:46
    GC 59895 @ 11:46
    GC 56740 @ 12:02
    GC 59130 @ 13:54
    GC 59125 @ 14:04
    GC 59923 @ 14:46
    GC 56782 @ 15:02
    GC 56804 @ 18:02
    GC 59140 @ 19:54
    GC 59135 @ 20:04
    GC 59993 @ 20:46
    GC 56820 @ 21:12

    Which is weird cause that's 15 not 14.....somebody please correct me if i'm wrong but i checked it a couple of times
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  21. Richard CZE

    Richard CZE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2020
    Messages:
    863
    Likes Received:
    1,083
    It would require a small technical modification on the locomotives. Whenever transporting flammable or cargo that can be damaged or ignited by sparks from the pantograph (broom), the front pantograph is always raised.

    IMG_0604.jpeg
     
    • Like Like x 2
  22. JBViper

    JBViper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2020
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    831
    Thank you for the list of the new schedules.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  23. Disintegration7

    Disintegration7 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2018
    Messages:
    2,820
    Likes Received:
    6,982
    No problem!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  24. LucaZone

    LucaZone Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    1,572
    Thanks for all the feedback everyone. We're very pleased everyone is enjoying the pack. If possible we'd really love you all to leave review and ratings on your chosen platform as this always helps inform others.

    We're watching and taking notes of all comments and questions. Its to early to indicate what if anything needs addressing. We will review all feedback and confirm accuracy against the prototype and the original author of the model. The same goes for turn around time on updates. As per Cargo Line Nuclear, while the changes were implemented within weeks of release, it took close to 6 months to find a release slot for them.

    Regarding timetable services, all Gas related trains start with the prefix of 'GC', so you can search that in the list. Additionally I've attached a 'Feature Sheet' detailing all things that come with Cargo Line Vol. 6 Gas.
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 8
  25. protonmw

    protonmw Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2022
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    151
    upload_2026-7-15_17-16-19.png upload_2026-7-15_17-16-39.png

    Labelling of length is wrong: it should be (-19.40m-) and ->15.30m<-
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 1
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  26. JBViper

    JBViper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2020
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    831
    Thanks, Adam, for your message and this useful file.

    Thanks to your team for this German route pack; but I really enjoy this route and hope to see this freight pack rolled out on other German routes in the future.

    For information: I’ve noticed a minor issue involving the RailDriver—specifically with the keys "PZB Acknowledged" and "PZB override", that doesn't work. Addition to my original post: I really should have specified that it was in the scenarios—the DB BR 185 is the one being used.
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2026 at 6:13 PM
    • Like Like x 1
  27. Emmy_MAN

    Emmy_MAN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2022
    Messages:
    646
    Likes Received:
    1,719
    What does this problem have to do with a goods wagon?
    If anything, it’s either a locomotive problem or a track problem.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  28. JBViper

    JBViper Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2020
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    831
    I really should have specified that it was in the scenarios—the DB BR 185 is the one being used.

    I wasn't talking about timetable mode.

    (I have modified my original post to include this clarification. Sorry !)
     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2026 at 6:14 PM

Share This Page