Loco Freightliner Br Class 70

Would be great, but the container braking physics with the 66 hasn't been addressed for ages....hopefully this doesn't follow suit.

 

unfortunately, I don't think so... the next patch will come on thursday which will also bring the extended mildmay line
and according to the roadmap, that's it for this month

 

Its not layering for me.

 

You might have to have other routes installed for it to show. I think original that didn't come freight i could be wrong tho.

 

No thats the only route for me they work properly on.

 

Apart from I believe Jan that has been on here and gave us some information, has anyone else not been on here since and come and said “we are aware of the issues, In particular: XYZ” ?.

would be nice if someone could acknowledge that they are looking at the feedback or if they have found a issue or something, that’s all.

 

I couldn't see them at all on MML

 

Why are some comments being moved out of the feedback thread? I can’t recall posting anything that didn’t entail some sort of feedback. Perhaps, instead of “managing” the criticism,DTG should be dragging AABS in here by the scruff of their necks to explain how they made such a ghastly mess of the physics and various other issues.

 

Hum why does the 70 struggle to start a 2100t train that a 66 with less tractive effort gets moving it should be the other way round.

 

Mentions layering on Glossop in the release article

 

I'd say it will be a more lukewarm fix by January.

 

I guess all of this is the final nail in the coffin for the 805 cab squares fix ever seeing the light of day, then… too many new bugs to look at, no time/resources to fix the “old”

 

Happened to my comments as well

 

If you check the discussions in this thread and the one in the feedback forum, it's because the physics are rubbish and both AABS and DTG have gone to ground over the matter.

 

looks nice though

 

And that's the problem They have seduced customers with the unique appearance (though not 100% accurate as reported in the feedback threads) and sounds which are admittedly good. But it's all for naught, if the physics take forever to start a heavy train, can't cope with gradients and a slight brake application puts you out the front window!

 

Maybe because you don't seem to own the DLC and still give feedback on it? That's the only explanation I can come up with.

 

He did own the DLC and because of the issues he is feeding back he refunded it? That feedback is just as relevant still

 

See below.

This. Plus you don’t need to own the product to feedback what could make the physics more accurate, etc.

 

Check. Just interested in what it might be. Don't now why they removed some of your messages then...

 

I had 4 posts move to a different thread

 

No problems running a GWML container train, what exactly are the problems people are experiencing?