Throw Us A Bone Here, D T G

Discussion in 'TSW General Discussion' started by OldVern, Jan 26, 2023.

  1. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    11,923
    Likes Received:
    23,937
    So I go to create a scenario for the Class 31 on Crewe to Liverpool (could be any other route).

    Get the consist list up and guess what - not a single loco hauled passenger service amongst them, other than hauling a dead DMU which is hardly much of a challenge.

    For crying out loud... If you're not prepared to give us Scenario Planner 2.0 or a consist editor, in the name of all that is good can someone take a five minute timeout and add a couple of passenger consists to the list - single Class 31 and Load 5 or 6, double headed Load 10 or 12.

    Is it really too much to ask for?
     
    • Like Like x 20
    • Helpful Helpful x 2
  2. tallboy7648

    tallboy7648 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2020
    Messages:
    6,567
    Likes Received:
    10,793
    Is scenario planner 2.0 still a thing? There hasn't been any news on that.

    I wonder what the difficulties are of adding a consist editor to the game
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. meridian#2659

    meridian#2659 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2021
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    3,736
    In my opinion (and its just what i assume), dtg doesnt want players give much own freedome in tsw 3 with scenario creations / consist creators. Tsc still needs a major selling point.

    Look at the very very few selectable sidings. They restricted it that much, you cant even build your own consists via shunt without spending 3 hours on a manual track section and let come train by train.

    Until 1 year ago you could take over a.i services which had active timetables. This got restricted, so now the only a.i trains which you can take over, are the oned reached its end destination. (Now the red warning sign appears "not able to control".

    Guess what: DTG must have noticed that players could make a small time table when you can just take over the a.i train and drive the route back. Also dtg could just have added 4 portals to each route, but .they didnt.

    There are a few path extension mods.

    DTG, for your execution in activly blocking tsw from its true potential i really should stop being a customer of you!! This is my honest point of view.
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2023
    • Like Like x 11
  4. stujoy

    stujoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2019
    Messages:
    6,475
    Likes Received:
    17,340
    There’s something about consists using content from more than one home route that means they can’t be used in player scenarios. As far as I can tell the loco hauled trains in Diesel Legends are a special case. They technically don’t have a home route at all, appearing only in a DLC for a route. I think this means they can’t be in Scenario Planner because of the way it looks for consists. Adam explained it once in a live stream as I recall.
     
  5. meridian#2659

    meridian#2659 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2021
    Messages:
    2,244
    Likes Received:
    3,736
    The good side effect of the training center is, that it could act as home route for all stock.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    11,923
    Likes Received:
    23,937
    That's what threw me a bit as I definitely recall seeing Class 31 passenger consists while driving Legends on GWE.

    Come on DTG, how hard can it be to do a bit of drag and drop or tick a couple of boxes. If need be give them a notional route to run on as a layer.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. smugstarlord#4202

    smugstarlord#4202 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2021
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    1,264
    Scenario planner 2.0 will be a selling point for TSW4. Watch this space....
     
    • Like Like x 12
  8. Dinosbacsi

    Dinosbacsi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2017
    Messages:
    3,312
    Likes Received:
    8,665
    Don't give them ideas!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. smugstarlord#4202

    smugstarlord#4202 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2021
    Messages:
    714
    Likes Received:
    1,264
    You know they'll have planned this since TSW2
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. DTG Matt

    DTG Matt Executive Producer Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,679
    Likes Received:
    13,792
    Last time we tried adding formations that were cross plugin they caused major problems for scenario planner as it didn't have the ability to respect cross plugin dependencies - resulting in a crash every time. Things have moved on and we can now set that on the formation level so... i'll get someone to test it again and see whether it's good now, and if so, see what we can get added :)
     
    • Like Like x 14
    • Helpful Helpful x 2
  11. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    11,923
    Likes Received:
    23,937
    Thanks Matt, appreciate the response.
     
  12. Princess Entrapta

    Princess Entrapta Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2021
    Messages:
    2,236
    Likes Received:
    2,760
    Something handy to come out of all that TSW3 work on unhooking trains from routes, perhaps?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Shaun123

    Shaun123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2018
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    1,304
    Matt,

    How far off would you say adding timetabled stops is in scenario planner? It’s the one thing that’s putting me off using it. I think if we had that we could see its full potential?
     
    • Like Like x 3
  14. 21c164fightercommand

    21c164fightercommand Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2021
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    428
    why not give us complete freedom to use the rolling stock on any route in any consist? ie. free roam, quick drive like in TSC?
    or would that be a deviating from the console game concept that seems to have TSW in its grip?
     
    • Like Like x 3
  15. marcsharp2

    marcsharp2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2019
    Messages:
    1,423
    Likes Received:
    2,558
    The 31 runs passenger services on Diesel legends and WSR, I think it also runs a Railtour on ECW. So it can run with carriages. That it's not available with carriages on Content creator is a bit crap.

    Edit: I didn't see Matt's response before posting my comment.
     
  16. Jpantera

    Jpantera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2019
    Messages:
    751
    Likes Received:
    1,781
    We need a timetable editor, or at least the ability to create new timetables if the tools can allow. Why we are locked out of stuff so.much is frustrating as the community could have sorted NTP and TVL by now.
     
    • Like Like x 6
  17. tallboy7648

    tallboy7648 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2020
    Messages:
    6,567
    Likes Received:
    10,793
    This was part of the idea for tsw3 trains but not tsw2/tsw2020 trains although that was due to technical reasons
     
  18. DTG Matt

    DTG Matt Executive Producer Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,679
    Likes Received:
    13,792
    I must admit I hadn't considered adding timed stops to each stop as a priority - interested to hear what others think. How much would you expect it to affect your experience and how would you anticipate adding those timings in? My concern is that it's easy for me to put a text field on each one that you can put the time in, but a) how many people would bother? and b) how do you know what they should be?

    I guess if you're copying a train entry from a real time table that's the most likely candidate?

    Added to my notes though.

    So "scenario planner" is a superset of TSC's "quick drive" - you can do more with Scenario Planner (defining bits of paths more easily, adding stop instructions etc) - it lacks in that you have to add all AI and you can't just benefit from AI placed by the quickdrive author, sure, i'm aware of that limitation and am thinking of solutions, but on the flipside, you can add any other trains you want and aren't *limited* by what one person put in either.

    The key bit you're missing though in TSW is the formation designer, which is also on my list of things I want to get added.

    As far as your list comment... "sigh" and "whatever".

    If you mean creating whole timetables - that's a mammoth task, takes weeks if not months of full time work, you're unlikely to to get an in-game editor for that because not only is the UI for it extremely complex, it also requires multiple hours-at-a-time sat number crunching just to re-simulate the timetable to a) test it and b) get all the start meta data so you can jump in anywhere.

    I *am* however keen to find some way to do it, I just have no idea what that looks like right now.

    Matt.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  19. Why can't dtg add a scenario to each route in scenario designer where the player could swap out trains as they please. I.e a scenario on bml where one could swap a 377 for a 375 or 465 or all the 377s for 375s and where there is freight on the scenario swap a 66 with a 37 and so on? This would give us access to more paths, platforms, sidings etc...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Stephen Crofts

    Stephen Crofts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2020
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    890
    I could see an unorthodox use for timed stops in making scenarios with quite tight timings as a challenge to see how closely the driver could get to time.
    Particularly fun with a twisty route that risks a derail on the way. Or with setting the scenario with different locos to see how hard the timing is in the class 40 say compared to the 377.

    As I said totally unorthodox but valid play potential there!
     
  21. Shaun123

    Shaun123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2018
    Messages:
    488
    Likes Received:
    1,304
    Thanks Matt,

    That is appreciated!

    For myself it’s the highest priority, having some sort of timetable to follow. I’m sure it’s a high priority for others too (hopefully they will confirm)

    It would certainly add to the realism of following a proper timetable. How would it be done? Well as I do now when I pay TSC and use the editor, use real world timetables, or Realtime Trains filling in the running times.

    If not some sort of text box as you said go show what time you should arrive/depart would be a fantastic addition to be honest.

    Again personal preference but if that was added then for me Scenario Planner would be as good as the TSC editor creating scenarios, I think it really is the most important thing that is missing.

    But thanks for replying Matt and listening to the feedback!

    Shaun.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  22. JonnE

    JonnE Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2020
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    964
    One thing that came to my mind is that timed stops in scenario planner could help in creating timings for AI services in order to achieve a certain player experience.
    As an example, I once created a scenario on MSB where the player takes a stopping service from Aschaffenburg to Heigenbrücken and gets overtaken by an IC during the approach (or at latest during the stop). Now in order for this to work properly it is necessary that Laufach is departed at a specific time which is no problem for the creator of a scenario but if you want to share it on CC you'd need to put the timetable in the scenario instructions which is not ideal for obvious reasons.
    A more gamey approach would be that the earned 1,000AP for a timed stop are a bit more worth than the Max. 750 we're now having as well ;)

    But specifically in further improvements regarding paths and AI services I see loads of potential in this!
     
  23. theorganist

    theorganist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Messages:
    5,565
    Likes Received:
    11,446
    I haven't delved into the TSW scenario planner yet. I have used the TSC scenario editor a lot and despite it throwing a hissy fit at times you can do quite a lot with it. In TSW I do feel some way to add timed stops on services, for example as seen in a working timetable, would greatly benefit the experience of scenario planner. And of course a consist editor.

    I would love to take the class 31 over NTP with a parcels train or imagine one has replaced a failed class 47 on a Liverpool to Newcastle servlce.

    A freeroam mode as in TSC would also be great. For example just setting up an 08 and some wagons in Teesyard so you could shunt around for a while or set some trains up at Victoria so you can just pick a trian and drive wherever you want, alls without the constriction of an actual service of scenario.

    I would love to see some kind of service mode planner or editor but it sounds like that may be a mammoth task.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  24. orb

    orb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2021
    Messages:
    441
    Likes Received:
    486
    I'd definitely have a use for this on single track lines, like WSR, IOW or Arosa. In the past while playing with scenario planner I needed to modify at least a couple of times start times of every AI services coming from the opposite side to get rid of dispatcher conflicts that caused red lights for both ways and making the scenario not being able to be finished. Setting a departure time at a given station (generally to extend the time the trains are stopped at double tracked stations) would probably fix the issue.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  25. ARuscoe

    ARuscoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    10,832
    Likes Received:
    10,482
    Might be getting the wrong end of the stick on this one but...
    For me this would be a case of "work out an AI timing and apply that as a minimum, then include the ability to extend the stop"
    It would affect the game play as the others have said, allowing overtakes or passes to be more flexible so that you can have clear running, then chasing yellows later on. If you could add them into stops as well as passenger stops (ie you can loop freight for a particular length of time) even better
     
    • Like Like x 1
  26. andrewandjane66

    andrewandjane66 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2020
    Messages:
    379
    Likes Received:
    676
    Not sure I would want this. For me scenario planner is to chill out and drive any train on any route without worrying about timetables, speeding or anything else that dictates gameplay.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  27. ARuscoe

    ARuscoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2018
    Messages:
    10,832
    Likes Received:
    10,482
    Then put that as an option... unlimited time on all stops, so you could take as much time as you like getting between them and as much time as you like at each stop... Would completely mess up the interactions though so not sure how the dispatcher would handle that, but maybe the latest iterations can manage that
     
    • Like Like x 1
  28. Scorpion71

    Scorpion71 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2017
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    1,874
    Being able to edit a current timetable would be very useful as a starting point if that could be possible, basically adding one service at a time to see if it doesn't screw up other services. I would love to be able to add more services on NTP and TVL in timetable mode.

    If this was possible, don't know how if would affect PIS - could we tell it to go off map with stopping points i.e. a HST leaving Leeds for Kings X
     
    Last edited: Jan 27, 2023
  29. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    11,923
    Likes Received:
    23,937
    Definitely go with this. One of my most used mods for MSTS was Activity Changer which allowed you to change the auto generated times to a round number. Open Rails, although I haven't used it much, has a timetable editor which allows precise times to be input. And technically, in the UK, even freight trains should adhere to their working timetable.

    There are a fair few sources to obtain old timetable data from - Disused Stations http://www.disused-stations.org.uk/ usually has a scan of them on the station pages, or Timetable World https://timetableworld.com - to assist in recreating authentic services.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  30. DTG Matt

    DTG Matt Executive Producer Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,679
    Likes Received:
    13,792
    Aside from the missing formations / formation designer - presumably you could already do this, this one is just about missing formations/designer.

    Because we don't pre-calculcate like TSC does, we'd currently need to run a timetable simulation to get those estimated times, which isn't feasibly (or currently possible) on the running game (it's a command line tool currently) - but - something to think about.

    Matt.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  31. stujoy

    stujoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2019
    Messages:
    6,475
    Likes Received:
    17,340
    Timetable timings and why I think they are important.

    I made a scenario on GWE using BR stock from NTP and I wanted it to feature lots of AI and a bit of parallel running. It was incredibly difficult to do what I wanted for many reasons but mainly the lack of timing options. Firstly, I could only put in start times and secondly these times could only be inputted with timings in 5 minute intervals (I did this over 18 months ago on PS4 and before Creators Club).

    For the scenario to work as I had envisaged, I had to alter the times many times and I ended up with about 10 iterations of timing changes, and AI stopping patterns to try and shift trains by less than the five minute window, used a lot of paper and a spreadsheet on my computer, and after this I still had to manually time my wait before setting off and my one stop at Slough every time I played it to get my train to parallel run correctly with any of the services on the slow line as I wanted.

    This was on a route where there are plenty of stops to allow many service options but it was a bit of a nightmare. I pretty much gave up on using scenario planner for anything other than a quick drive without AI after that.

    Even that is hard enough with the daft paths that appear on many routes. I always seem to be swapped over to wrong way running for some reason, like the paths are taken from those diverted scenarios rather than proper timetable service paths. I would certainly like to use scenario planner but it really can’t do anything I want it to.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  32. DTG Matt

    DTG Matt Executive Producer Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    2,679
    Likes Received:
    13,792
    One of the problems currently with paths is that they're authored separately and with a different (much simpler) tool than the one used for services and scenarios - and we can't actually see the path at all until you get it in game. This is a key thing i'm asking to be changed, it should just use the same proven and easy to use tool and that would make the whole process much quicker (more paths!) and much more reliable (no stupid routing!).

    Will put my thinking cap on about start times and stopping times, appreciate the feedback folks.

    Matt.
     
    • Like Like x 10
  33. George1862

    George1862 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2020
    Messages:
    242
    Likes Received:
    115
    I wanna put 37 on rhtt
     
    • Like Like x 1
  34. lcyrrjp

    lcyrrjp Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    769
    Likes Received:
    1,599
    Just adding my voice to the call for the ability to create timetabled stops with times in scenario planner. I don't use scenario planner at all at the moment because this is missing.

    Also (and even more valuable for me) the capability to run any train you own on any service in timetable mode would be a huge step forward. Some modders (such as 'ADTRAINSUK') have managed to do it - meaning we can, for example, run a Class 166 on a 323 schedule on Cross City, so it's clearly possible. If it could be made so that us mere mortals could manage it, that would be superb.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  35. Stephen Crofts

    Stephen Crofts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2020
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    890
    That would be so good. Like a pre-populated quick play.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  36. Jpantera

    Jpantera Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2019
    Messages:
    751
    Likes Received:
    1,781























    Matt,

    Thanks for the Response, here's hoping something can be brought to the table regarding timetable editing. No doubt it's hard work, some on here have done it for a living on the Railway also.
     
  37. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    11,923
    Likes Received:
    23,937
    Briefly when I worked in Train Planning, then in the Control doing VSTP schedules as part of the job. sometimes even validated against the rest of the timetable! In truth that was an aspect of the job I really enjoyed as it required quite a bit of thought at times, then there were occasions trying to path a short notice tamper move out of West Ealing across to the Down Relief line then off towards Reading you just had to squeeze it between the existing 3 minute headways and hope there weren't too many "delay minutes" attributed to it!

    \you also learned about parts of the network not directly on the Western/Wales route.

    The biggest fun I had was coming in for a Saturday Day Turn on the West Country Desk and finding a VSTP request for a 07+45 St Phillips Marsh to Haymarket (Class 158 transfer) which the Night Turn had kindly left but the VSTP section didn't start until 0800!
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page