i am sure there are people that would be thinking that the class 222 should have been in the midlands mainline route because that route was really good but sometimes tsw can disappoint you unfortunately.
222 and MML appear together in 184 posts so rest assured it has already been mentioned. Hopefully it will come along as dlc or part of another route.
These posts aren't really helpful. Make it worth reading rather than just vocalising some loose thoughts.
Probably the reason why skyhook didn't make a class 222 is when you think about it a rehashed version of the HST is No.1 more easier to make and No.2 it would make more sense to release the 222 as a DLC.
There is some irony to release a route titled "Midland Mainline" without the flagship traction of the route! Class 222 should be have been included by default.
Oh wow they are old! No wonder the Auroras are coming in now. I thought the new Hitachis were a bit premature until now!
Your reply comes off as unnecessarily snarky. Since when did people here start gatekeeping what people can talk about? Their recent activity shows nothing along the lines of spamming anything of the sort. And sure, maybe their question has been posted before in some form but you have the capacity to ignore it and move on.
Sorry but I just thought I'd have a look at his recent postings and well they all seem to reference (or go on to reference) the 222 so Vern was right. Sorry to be the the one to break the news.
Also they have all badges like 1k messages with 22 messages and 10 likes. How do you not notice that really fishy stench circling around this thread!
I don't think that was ever hinted at. From what I understand spamming is repeatedly putting across the same message even when it is not relevant which my screenshot proves has been done. Anyway I can't be doing with getting thingy about this as frankly I don't care enough and it is gone 2 in the morning.
Not sure what is SPAM, the "Midland Mainline" titled route was released without the Midland Mainline flagship traction. Perhaps that is quite normal to some people?
It is annoying that we didn't get the flagship of the Midland Mainline but this thread is talking about class 222s not class 45s.
It's already a well known fact that due to dev times/cost's, we can only have one new train per route, so if we did get the 222 it would've meant no 158 and therefore no local services.
When I posted my reply the badges were showing correctly. Right now as I post this they are showing incorrectly. It has been an issue on the forum for years. It's a non-issue really as forum badges are just a bit of fluff.
Yes, that’s how it looks to me too at present on this thread. It’s because the system in the forum is broken. It’s been like that for years with new members having all the badges showing sometimes despite them not having them. What I think I worked out was happening was that it shows your badges instead of those of the member when they start a thread but I can’t be sure of that because I’m not the admin of the site and can’t check, but I have seen it happening for years. The new member doesn’t actually have those badges it is just how it shows up sometimes. The other day the same member was showing only a few of badges to me on this thread but it still wasn’t the right number. If I go and find another post right now that isn’t the start of a thread it shows the real badges he has… It’s the forum that is broken.
