Route Mittenwaldbahn: Innsbruck - Garmisch-partenkirchen Feedback Thread

Discussion in 'Player Feedback' started by dtg_jan, Feb 11, 2025.

  1. hyperlord

    hyperlord Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2019
    Messages:
    1,495
    Likes Received:
    1,536
    diseverinix Toggle the legend off when in live map is the workaround for consoleros AFAIK
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. diseverinix

    diseverinix Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2024
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    98
    Ok I‘ll try it (I‘m on PC ofc given it‘s a modded timetable but it might work)
     
  3. max#2873

    max#2873 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2022
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    1,063
    60 minutes on Xbox and crash, no chance to make any scenario. Where are admins to acknowledge this awful situation? Shame.
     
  4. maddog39

    maddog39 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2025
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Recently started playing this DLC and found numerous issues so far as many others have reported. I'm just here to report that the DB 111 timetable service titled "E1728 (Karwendel) Preparation" spawns you with "Signal Passed At Danger" and is unplayable. I was hoping to do this prep service followed by the run from Innsbruck to Garmisch.
     
  5. vendys#6021

    vendys#6021 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2024
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    332
    I'm not there right now, I can't try, but in general, when a locomotive is passing a train, etc., at some exits, approval is required from the signalman and then the signal is released to proceed. If there can't be a mistake in this
     
  6. VanDooooom

    VanDooooom Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2023
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    49
    I made a timetable run with the 111 from Innsbruck to Mittenwald in the evening. Game crashed about 15 Minutes before Mittenwald. There was no such thing, before the update with "more mountains"
    Normally I am not the complaining guy, but it starts to p...ss me off. Frankfurt Fulda, not playable, Garmisch Innsbruck same. Honest Feedback from DTG, where..? Of course just new announcements of incoming content.

    I really like trains, and unfortunately there is no alternative on Xbox. I normally buy every new German, Austrian, Dutch DLC day one. If it goes on like this, I really don't know
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  7. frank1116

    frank1116 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2021
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    740
    I have tried the same run yesterday and arrived in Garmisch without any troubles. However i have experienced one crash on this route. On the crash-run i recall using a custom livery and have used map and switching camera position extensivly. These are exactly what DTG recommended to avoid. (beside dynamic weather see
    Temporary Workarounds To Help Performance / Reduce Crashes

    Not the best option, but imho Mittenwald is one of the best DLC and i wouldn t be discouraged.
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  8. maddog39

    maddog39 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2025
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't really understand. In this case, you receive a SPAD immediately upon spawn. You have no opportunity to affect anything in the game.
     
  9. Oenta

    Oenta Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2023
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    10
    Possible Fix for crashes on Mittenwaldbahn and Frankfurt Fulda for Xbox series X:

    After testing i've found that if you dont use quick resume (loading up the game with all the dlc before starting Fulda or Mittenwaldbahn) will help prevent crashes.

    Also I used HD graphics (yes it looks not nice, but i got used to it) from the settings and Custom Clear weather. Make sure you dont use much of the external camera's or photo mode. Zooming in maybe also builds up memory.

    Also prevent using open windows in the cab and avoid using the horn if you can as much as possible, because somehow I think the sound engine can also make the game crash and will build up memory usage.

    On mittenwaldbahn you can get away with a lot more gameplay like external views and looking around etc because the route is more forgiving than Fulda Frankfurt.

    So... basically sit in the cab still...and just drive the train

    But with this method I could complete long services, also during rush hour. No problems when entering Frankfurt hbf for instance.

    More info from the dev's:

    https://forums.dovetailgames.com/th...nds-to-help-performance-reduce-crashes.88010/

    Hopefully the dev's will fix these 2 routes... so we can play them normally. But for now this should work for some people that are willing to take some sacrifices.
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2025
    • Helpful Helpful x 2
  10. laurie

    laurie New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2020
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    4
    I had that too. Instead I selected “On foot” at Innsbruck, at 4:55 (to give me time to walk around in case I got lost - which I did!). I walked over to where 5417 Train Preparation (Part 2) finishes, took over the train a few minutes after the AI had finished connecting to the empty carriages, and I was able to start the service at around 5:08.

    I finished with 9,577 APs, which wasn’t too bad.
     
  11. max#2873

    max#2873 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2022
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    1,063
    I have even better crash prevention method... stay on platform and don't move.
     
  12. jstange

    jstange Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2018
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    84
    Thanks a lot for this! Your method is way more efficient and way easier to follow!
     
  13. AmityBlight

    AmityBlight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2024
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    Service E3614 Preparation starting at 13:51 in Mittenwald. I get derailed each and every time I try crossing the X switch at track no. 4.
    [​IMG]
     
  14. iriv#7314

    iriv#7314 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2021
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    325
    Yes, same effect here (egs)
    it's not a crossing, it's a launch pad
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. TimTri

    TimTri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2021
    Messages:
    1,579
    Likes Received:
    3,369
    It seems like Mittenwaldbahn got some fixes with the latest patch. Can someone summarize if any of the bigger issues that were mentioned in this thread are still there?
     
  16. OpenMinded

    OpenMinded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2021
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    2,088
    • Like Like x 2
  17. solicitr

    solicitr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2020
    Messages:
    13,061
    Likes Received:
    19,913
    This is not necessarily unprototypical. I'm not saying it isn't an error in the route, but you can encounter this IRL. One example would be if a block signal goes green because a train ahead has moved on, another would be if the switch/interlocking the signal is protecting changes from a diverging route to ahead, so that you got a Vr2 but by the time you reach the Hauptsignal things have gone clear again..
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2025
  18. AmityBlight

    AmityBlight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2024
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    This exact same sentence went through my mind while reading the patch notes.

    I'm very glad that Linke Rheinstrecke got some very much needed and long requested fixes (although it took TSG's effort to fix DTG's route...) but the treatment of Mittenwaldbahn in regard of updates is very frustrating. As of now, I'm convinced that DTG is holding back the patch(es) on purpose. :(
     
    • Like Like x 3
  19. solicitr

    solicitr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2020
    Messages:
    13,061
    Likes Received:
    19,913
    Oooh, this is nice! A quasi-expert feature in a base locomotive. Although faults per se are not modeled, it's possible with the 1020, dragging a heavy load up those grades, to overheat the transformer. You have to keep the draw under 200 amps except for short bursts.
     
  20. Rutger Luiten

    Rutger Luiten Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    151
    I also derailed 2 times with the mission E3614 Preparation. But I also noticed that in Mittenwald a lot of switches doesn't have junction motors. Is this correct?
     
  21. iriv#7314

    iriv#7314 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2021
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    325
    try service 5439 (part 1) at 07:40 in the 1020. there are 2 such situations between garmish and mittenwald.
    (and those weren't even the ones i meant before :))

    No other trains in sight.

    Same run: approaching middelwald double yellow doesn't trigger 1000hz light (vorsicht)
    edit: same for double yellow at scharnits in part 2 (vorsicht) main signal is red here
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2025
  22. max#2873

    max#2873 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2022
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    1,063
    XBOX X after 60min CTD... still
     
  23. michel.guinand

    michel.guinand New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2021
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    9
    On the "Mittenwaldbahn" in "Railway Travel," Chapter 3, I rode train E 14116 Innsbruck - Dortmund. While waiting for an oncoming train in Klais, I encountered the E 3621 Garmisch-Partenkirchen - Mittenwald, traveling backwards. This means the locomotive was at the back, or the control car was missing.

    Auf der "Mittenwaldbahn" im Eisenbahnreisen, Kapitel 3 fuhr ich den Zug E 14116 Innsbruck - Dortmund. Als ich in Klais auf ein gegen Zug warten musst, kommt mir den E 3621Garmisch-Partenkirchen - Mittenwald, rückwärts entgegen. Das heisst die Lok war hinten, oder es fehlt der Steuerwagen.

    20250528143119_1.jpg 20250528143154_1.jpg
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2025
    • Like Like x 1
  24. AmityBlight

    AmityBlight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2024
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    Confirmed. The E3621 leaves Garmisch at 20:06 with the n-Wagen facing forward, loco at the rear:
    [​IMG]

    Also, it's not listed as playable service in the timetable, but if you spawn on foot and sit in the driver's seat in the loco (the one facing the n-Wagen), the service can be taken over. :o
    This is perhaps the weirdest bug I've encountered on Mittenwaldbahn so far...
     
    • Like Like x 3
  25. AmityBlight

    AmityBlight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2024
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    I just noticed something, that seems loosely related to the problem posted above:
    Shunting services which start with the n-Wagen facing forward don't seem to appear in the timetable.

    I just brought the E681 from Garmisch to Innsbruck successfully. Afterwards, there's a followup shunting service for changing direction at Innsbruck. I have to push the train backwards away from the platform, to a siding, move around it and push it back to the platform again.
    Long story short, I messed up big time during the shunting and derailed at a misaligned switch. Ashamed I went back to the main menu and wanted to start the shunting service anew, but it's not in the timetable. :|
     
  26. NateDogg7a

    NateDogg7a Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2021
    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    All apologies if this has been mentioned before, but for those that are interested it does seem that Quick Off/Schnell Aus has been mapped to D-pad down on the controller, at least for Series S. I read some comments that this was possibly planned, but never saw any confirmation that it had actually been implemented.

    As far as Mittenwaldbahn on Series S, although I was at first hesitant to buy due to reduced draw distances, I can say that it is still enjoyable despite that and very much worth it. A top route for sure.
     
  27. Sun_King_135

    Sun_King_135 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2021
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    32
    I had some wonderful rides on the Mittenwaldbahn today. But, I did notice two details I'd like to share.

    1. There are some timetable activities, where the cab control car is missing. The loco will be at the rear of the train. It would've been nice if a Bnrdzf was included to solve this. Is there any such planned?

    2. The red Intercity coach reads Avmz 207. The chassis is wrong in both, the door and door window shape, as well as the red signalling lights. Here's a link to the real coach, you'll notice what I mean.

    https://www.fnp.de/frankfurt/frankf...ghafen-schon-2019-fertig-werden-11747016.html

    Will this be fixed at some point?

    Kind regards.
     
  28. OpenMinded

    OpenMinded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2021
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    2,088
    I think its safe to assume that none of your suggestions are planned. This DLC has been delivered as such and I would not see any need for the devs to invest much more time on this. If you are on PC there is a nice modern tt mod available, though...

    I think I dont really understand your first point, though. Are you saying there are tt services where the loco is at the back of the train? Are you maybe talking about the shunting operations in Innsbruck? They were explained by Lukas to be prototypical, though. Other then these, I have not seen any such consists driving around.

    The link in your second point directs me to an article about the refurbishments in Frankfurt Flughafen Regional Bahnhof and have absolutely nothing to do with an Avmz. Maybe the wrong link?
     
  29. DominusEdwardius

    DominusEdwardius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    468
    There is a bit of an oops in the timetable where one service accidentally reverses from Garmisch to Mittenwald. That was not intentional!
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  30. Sun_King_135

    Sun_King_135 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2021
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    32
    Well, it seems understandable on the one hand, taking into consideration that development of a chassis takes more effort than with previous simulators. However, I think I can say that I can expect a well researched product, when the initial price has been increased by another 4 EUR.

    Don't get me wrong, but I remarked the error with the red Intercity coach even before the preview stream on a German forum and nothing has been changed. I just want to know, why products are announced and presented in that attitude, when research hasn't been conducted adequately? I mean would anyone accept the TGV painted as ICE and pay the full price? I bought the product, because I like the route and hope for more 1980s and 1990s stuff, but I do have to consider future purchases being done during discounts.
    I changed the link by the way, but will add it once more.

    What I am trying to say is, if anyone knows images from Innsbruck in these days, they'll notice how much went amiss on what made Innsbruck as a transit hub between north and south so special - the variety of trains. And yes, there are some services where the loco is at the rear, because there should've been a cab car Silberling, which are not shunting ops.

    Cab car Silberling

    http://www.eisenbahnerinnerungen.de/wagen/db-BDnrz739-361-09.html

    Deactivated cab car

    http://www.eisenbahnerinnerungen.de/wagen/db-BDnb742-051-15.html

    Intercity coach

    https://www.jernhesten.dk/forbillede/DB/Personvogne/resultat.asp?quest=Avmz-207-1&selskab=DB

    I like the add on and the rides today were splendid. Its just that such details were firstly, easy to research and secondly, they were mentioned long before initial release. That is saddening. The route and the atmosphere, besides this, is splendid, though.

    Kind regards
     
  31. DominusEdwardius

    DominusEdwardius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    468
    Cab cars were not really used on the route, the trains often but not always carried the deactivated cab cars acting more for luggage compartment reasons more than anything. It was not included just for time sake, the (deactivated) cab car is quite a different beast to the Bnb and ABnb and would have added considerably to the development time and so had to be dropped.

    Similarly the Avmz we are aware it is the wrong one, but considering it would be have required a major rebuild it couldn't be justified for a bonus addition. The IC coaches were not originally in the plan for the route, they were a relatively last minute addition with there only really being time for a couple of bug fixes and a limited repaint. Again it would be a case of not having it entirely, or working with what we had available.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  32. OpenMinded

    OpenMinded Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2021
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    2,088
    Havnt spotted this one yet. Which one is it, if I may ask:)

    EDIT: But I would agree, this kind of thing I would expect to get fixed over time. There are more pressing (at least for me) signalling and visual bugs with this route, which I am more bothered with, tbf, then the occasioanly pushed service...
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2025 at 12:19 AM
  33. Sun_King_135

    Sun_King_135 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2021
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    32
    I understand, I fully understand and appreciate yoy having taken time to respond in a depth, that was unbeknownst to me.

    I do, however, feel the need to ask if these coaches (deactivated cab car and the original Avmz-207) could not be considered for a later point for authenticity reasons? The Bqmz on the other hand is a perfect example on how it could've been done right. It really looks as how the original looked like.

    As said, what you've written makes perfect sense and, as I said earlier, I purchased Niddatalbahn and Mittenwaldbahn to support you and your idea for retro stuff. So, may I express hope for the most common German coach class - the m-Wagen? It'd be a dream come true for me and many others. They could be used for the Mittenwaldbahn, the 1984 timetable etc.. Same would go for the DBBR 420 sixth series in the classy paints.

    Thanks once more.

    Kind regards.
     
  34. DominusEdwardius

    DominusEdwardius Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    468
    I don't think you can actually drive it because of the wrong end but its service E3621 at some silly hour, I think you have to spawn on foot to see it.

    I would love to see more period coaches (and wagons) to flesh out the various timetables. Be they Am/Bm's etc, or Mitteleinstiegswagen and any number of other Bundesbahn or ÖBB coaches. The Hasenkasten are another obvious almost mandatory addition for the future, but as of right now we don't have anything to disclose but always keep an eye out on the roadmap.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  35. Sun_King_135

    Sun_King_135 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2021
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    32
    You can't estimate how relieved it feels to read that. It is exactly what I am looking forward for as well. As well as I am hoping for the 420 in the old paints, eg for layers in Linke Rheinstrecke or Niddatalbahn.

    Is there a reason, why there's no adverts a later "Alle reden vom Wetter, wir nicht" or "Alles schläft, einer Fährt" that were mounted in fittings as seen here? Take note of the fittings in the door area as well.

    https://www.bahnbilder.de/bild/Deut...tungen/44430/innenraum-eines-silberlings.html

    Maybe, I might add as an idea for a future project the "Rollbahn" between Münster and Osnabrück in the 1980s. That would be the ideal route for these trains. Looking forward to more retro from you. The route itself was worth paying the full price.

    Kind regards.
     

Share This Page