Db Br 101 - Substitution With Db Br 182

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by docsnyder1911, Dec 12, 2020.

  1. docsnyder1911

    docsnyder1911 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1,372
    Dear Community. As you know the DB BR 101 is in production for TSW2 and it will pull and push IC trains most likely. And that's why I think it would be nice if the Taurus could do that too. Sure in real the use of the Taurus is very rare, but some Tauri did IC services in real. Also the topspeed of 230 kph makes the Taurus very able for IC services.
     
    • Like Like x 34
  2. nsbtog18

    nsbtog18 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2020
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    257
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 16
  3. FD1003

    FD1003 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,662
    Likes Received:
    3,959
    100% support, at least between the 101 and the MRCE 182 if the old one won't be updated
     
    • Like Like x 8
  4. Snek

    Snek Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2020
    Messages:
    316
    Likes Received:
    1,171
    This is where I'd support DTG making something sligthly unrealistic. Like they did with thr 182 substitution on freight trains, they should make it very rare on AI services but we can drive it anytime we want.
     
    • Like Like x 12
  5. w.lichko

    w.lichko Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2019
    Messages:
    270
    Likes Received:
    755
    Yes absolutely!! Would be able to reach the maximum permitted speed on HMA with the mighty speedy Taurus!! :D

    Shouldn't be too challenging or costly to enable the Rapid Transit 182 (hopefully with LZB functionality) to substitute for the 101 if HMA gets IC layers.
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2020
    • Like Like x 4
  6. creeperblox2710

    creeperblox2710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2020
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    591
    The Thing is, has it been confirmed that it will pull IC Coaches?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. docsnyder1911

    docsnyder1911 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1,372
    Not official. But which other purpose should the 101 have?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. LucasLCC

    LucasLCC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2020
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    2,885
    I also hope that the substitution is allowed. The 182 is my favourite loco, and it's a shame that it's so limited in operation.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  9. creeperblox2710

    creeperblox2710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2020
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    591
    Well it could pull Freight Coaches but yeah
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. docsnyder1911

    docsnyder1911 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1,372
    You will be surprised. There was a time, when Deutsche Bahn planned to transfer all 101 to DB Cargo. They thought they could do all passenger long range travel with EMU's. If they realized that this is not possible, the 101 kept their IC services

    And I give you right. It would be nice if the 101 could do freight services in TSW2 too.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Aufzug

    Aufzug Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2020
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    168
    I think if something like that isn't added, a consist creator giving you the ability to put together whatever train formation you like would be excellent for situations like these.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. docsnyder1911

    docsnyder1911 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2019
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    1,372
    Completely agreeing.
     
  13. Callum B.

    Callum B. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2018
    Messages:
    1,638
    Likes Received:
    2,844
    Imagine that! :o
     
  14. markalesso

    markalesso Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2020
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    83
    I support it man! Good idea! :)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Vectron383

    Vectron383 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2020
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    34
    I completely agree as well, one thing I hate is the fact that loco consists are so fixed and binary, especially if it is a consist seen in real life.
     
  16. Fitz

    Fitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2019
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    702
    They found out that the 101s were not built to haul freight at all as one or two of them ended up with their frames starting to bend.
     
  17. flystentz

    flystentz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2020
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    51
    I completly agree to use the 182 to sub for the 101 locos.
    I have just driven a custom scenario from the creators club, where i presume a pc player have linked the loco to the ic wagons.

    it would be so nice to be able to use the 182 for the intercity services in timetable mode, since its so nice to drive in.

    also would be awesome to go full speed with it as also the 101 on the new route in TSW3!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. driverwoods#1787

    driverwoods#1787 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2021
    Messages:
    9,135
    Likes Received:
    5,640
    One more thing it does are Sleeper Train Jobs look no further than the 02:01 Aschaffenburg to Wurzburg Trip 02:41 Koln Aachen 21:39 Aachen 22:16 Koln Hbf .
    Here's the Taurus locomotive at Aachen Hbf

    my comment in the video had a Slovenian Railfan saying if the Taurus 182 1116 broke down in Aachen the DB BR101 has to run the sleeper train trips.
    Besides the Sleeper Train 182 1116 does freight on Koln Aachen seen here
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page