Why So Many Dmus?

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by aeronautic237, Sep 7, 2022.

  1. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    This thread I'm not as nervous about posting for some reason, maybe because it is in Off-Topic.

    Why were there so many old British DMUs?
    For anyone who isn't aware, imagine the British Rail Class 101 from Tees Valley Line or Northern Trans-Pennine. Now imagine lots of tiny variations in it made, with each iteration being dubbed:

    (Clears throat)

    Class 100
    Class 101 (as mentioned above)
    Class 102
    Class 103
    Class 104
    Class 105
    Class 106
    Class 107
    Class 108
    Class 109
    Class 110
    Class 111
    Class 112
    Class 113
    Class 114
    Class 115
    Class 116
    Class 117
    Class 118
    Class 119
    Class 120
    Class 121
    Class 122
    Class 123
    Class 124
    Class 125
    Class 126
    Class 127
    Class 128
    Class 129
    Class 130

    And I kid you not they all look very similar (I don't want to say "identical", because A) It would hurt quite a few people here and B) It's not true)

    But why so many?
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2022
  2. CK95

    CK95 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2019
    Messages:
    3,177
    Likes Received:
    9,162
    A very basic answer is that lot of Gen 1& Gen 2 MU’s look the same, because they’re mostly based on one body shell.

    The technical differences will be where the differences are, depending on their intended use & region. It would be quite a lot to type out the specifics for each one, but I’m sure someone will have the time to do so.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. You could look at it in the same way as cars. Why do you need for example a BMW 318, 320, 325, 328, 330, 335 all look the same but each one is different.

    Did I forget the 323.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2022
    • Like Like x 1
  4. royalscot#3684

    royalscot#3684 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2022
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    490
    BR outsourced them to several different builders, partly because some early DMU iterations were disappointing in service and partly because there was a degree of experimentation in the 1950s.

    BR specified different uses (high and low density, local and Intercity). Different regions also had different policies and attitudes towards technical details (corridor connections, transmissions systems etc) - so for example the 101s in TSW didn't get to the Western in any numbers until the 1970s, while 117s rarely left the Western until the 1980s.

    Basically it was a mess - unlike Italy, for example, that settled on one type (with minor variations and improvements) from the 1960s right until the 1990s.

    Since privatisation the mess has only got worse.
     
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2022
    • Like Like x 2
  5. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Right so it isn't just purpose but region, just like the 313 and 314 and 315. Thank you.
    I did not realise there were so many 3-series vehicles, but were those not different generations? All these DMUs seem to have come out at the same time - but I will need someone to confirm that, because I do not want to do 30 Wikipedia searches (sorry).
    I see, the reason seems to be the different regions and uses of the DMUs, as well as the experimental era that happened when the WCML was electrified. (There was a YT video).

    Although when you say that the mess is getting worse, are you talking about the Desiros or something? I haven't seen the mess get to the point of having 30 different types of very similar looking trains recently, could you kindly elaborate?

    But above all, thank you everyone for helping me with this.
     
  6. fabdiva

    fabdiva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    809
    Generally different builders and roles - but mostly with a standard BR Corporate look specified.
     
  7. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Oh so British Railways wanted them to look the same - that makes sense.
     
  8. royalscot#3684

    royalscot#3684 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2022
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    490
    In the 1950s when many were designed there wasn't really a corporate look or many common design principles across different builders - in some cases different designs even had different couplings so they couldn't work together. Gradually cabs, windows and engines were standardised across several similar classes but this took a while. Units from the same builder (eg Derby, Metro Cammell) tended to look superficially the same but different classes were often quite different under the skin. Some licensed built DMUs had common appearances across classes and builders (Pressed Steel 117s and Derby 127 are easy to mistake for each other) but were mechanically very different even though they undertook almost identical outer suburban roles albeit on different regions.

    Some aspects of the later DMU design were ridiculous in hindsight, such as the widespread use of asbestos. That's why some units (trans Pennines) never made it into preservation. There was also a determination to put engines under the floor (for reasons of cost mainly) which meant many poorly insulated DMUs were noisy and unpleasant. Only the Southern put engines in separate compartments away from passengers. These were much better but not many were built due to rapid electrification in the South
     
  9. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Am I right in thinking this is also why EMUs like the 4CIG, VEP, CEP, and BEP look similar?

    I remember someone here said they wanted them in TSW, which is fine, but they said that while saying that the current crop of EMUs look the same, which I found extremely odd, given that the ones they were requesting also look very similar.

    Sorry I may have digressed...
     
  10. fabdiva

    fabdiva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    809
    The Southern Region was very conservative - and would rather stick to variations on a standard design. The CIG, VEP, REP and TC all have a common cab front end. They stuck with Mk1 based designs well into the 70s! Similarly pretty much everything apart from the REP had the same motors and traction gear. (REP motor cars were basically a 73 under the floor) Quite a few reused components from previous designs too.
     
  11. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Right - I guess it is much cheaper to not restyle trains all the time.

    The character of British railways (both current and bygone) is probably what I love most about them, especially how much things have changed over the years.

    Thank you everyone who answered, I now know a fair bit more about BR in the late 20th century.
     
  12. theorganist

    theorganist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Messages:
    5,565
    Likes Received:
    11,446
    They may look similar and many shared similarities but there were many differences too as alluded to above.

    However we only have one type in the sim and there were only a handful in TSC so they aren't at all well represented in the sims.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. eldomtom2

    eldomtom2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2022
    Messages:
    1,624
    Likes Received:
    1,834
    Well asbestos was used everywhere on the railways at that point, one can hardly call that a DMU-specific failing.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  14. driverwoods#1787

    driverwoods#1787 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2021
    Messages:
    9,087
    Likes Received:
    5,607
  15. Pipe

    Pipe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2022
    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    3,439
    On a related side note: I seek an answer to the question why all rail vehicles, at least from the BR era, have their front and back painted in yellow? And with astonishing POOR lighting? Is this supposed to be some signaling color? Did this somehow prevent accidents? Or even suicides? Hmmm ....
     
  16. theorganist

    theorganist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Messages:
    5,565
    Likes Received:
    11,446
    I think it was to make the trains visible to track workers etc.
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 2
  17. I think it was to reduce accidents. A bright yellow train is a lot easier to spot than a dark blue one.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  18. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Yes, but to be fair, their similarities would lead some to question why the resources weren't spent on a completely different loco, instead of a very similar one.
    Fire - I didn't realise they were that volatile!
    I think the poor headlights were to avoid dazzling oncoming drivers.
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  19. They were good units. Why change something that doesn't need changing? Same as the vep and cep's, a sight on Britain's railways for many years.

    Cost is a big factor, upgrading bits and bobs on current rolling stock is a lot cheaper than developing and building new stock from scratch.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. driverwoods#1787

    driverwoods#1787 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2021
    Messages:
    9,087
    Likes Received:
    5,607
    You forgot the 4CEP which was the EMU used on 27 April 1986 Hastings Line electric service. Furthermore these are called slammers
     
  21. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Yeah, cost makes sense, but they had to be changed eventually. They look pretty dated when compared to the Desiros and IETs of today (not that that's a bad thing! ;))
    I don't know how you know so much about the railways around the world. Whenever I see you post, you are like a human encyclopedia! How did you learn so much!

    And yes I didn't include the 4CEP because I didn't know it existed. I didn't know how to check for how many more EMUs there were because nobody ever uses their TOPS Class (e.g. Class 411 (thanks Moleman))
     
  22. This is the UK everything is dated. They've only just got round to updating telecommunications in recent years, so we can enjoy the high speed Internet the rest of the world does. One of my neighbours is still burning coal! Even the rail infrastructure, again until recent years it was the same infrastructure as when It was layed decades ago.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  23. theorganist

    theorganist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Messages:
    5,565
    Likes Received:
    11,446
    Well I would rather be able to recreate realistic operations, which I assumed was one of the aims of a simulator. If a DMU is the wrong one for a route why is that less important than having the wrong loco for a route?!

    The class 101 is not the be all and end all of DMU's! Apart from the Chester based ones they would have been rare in Manchester in 1983 as depicted on NTP. None of the Manchester depots had them.

    There were in fact lots of subtle differences as well as some which make many look very different from each other.
     
    Last edited: Sep 10, 2022
    • Like Like x 1
  24. fabdiva

    fabdiva Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2019
    Messages:
    906
    Likes Received:
    809
    It was to increase visibility to track workers. Crap Lighting carried through from the steam era, it wasn't until the 70s that effort started to go into improving lighting.

    Now with modern lighting Yellow ends are now option if a train meets the current lighting standard.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  25. driverwoods#1787

    driverwoods#1787 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2021
    Messages:
    9,087
    Likes Received:
    5,607
    I used to get railway magazines and Model Railway catalogues from the US UK and Germany the Marklin ones that's how I knew the designations 4CEP electrification voltages
     
  26. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    11,928
    Likes Received:
    23,951
    Although my personal favourite DMU was the Class 120 Swindon built Cross Country units, the one type DTG should probably look at adding to the sim is the Class 108. These were quite widespread over the network and one of the last types to be withdrawn once Sprinter/Pacer deliveries were complete.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  27. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Oh yeah, forgot about that... but even still, apart from your neighbour (no offense please), everything is changing. You said yourself - we are getting new telecommunication infrastructure, and the rail infrastructure is getting relayed, so it was only inevitable that the rolling stock would be replaced. Although, I can understand nostalgia - I wish I could have ridden more of the D-stock (and I never got the opportunity to ride the Circle and Metropolitan Line before the S-stock came in).

    Then again, I may be biased since I was never alive when those old units were around, so I feel no nostalgia for them.
    I do agree - lots of subtle differences (especially that one that has the exhaust pipes in front of the cab!). However, those (like me) who miss important details and things (I drove the BML many times, and never noticed the missing track coming out of Redhill until I saw the forum post), and those people will see the DMUs as "the same."

    I think the issue that people will have is that, if there was another one of these DMUs made for a route, most people would much rather their money was spent on a completely new loco and therefore driving experience (such as a Pacer or Civicity).

    But who knows! Maybe I'm wrong, and if DTG play their cards right, then perhaps people will accept more old DMUs!
    Ah I see. I didn't realise magazines could have so much information within them! How do you remember it all? I can't remember all the American freight locos in TSW!
     
  28. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Why is it the 120 out of interest? I like the Class 121 because it is the one with the exhaust pipes on the front.
     
  29. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    11,928
    Likes Received:
    23,951
    The 120's had a distinctive appearance.
    They were lovely comfortable DMU's to travel on.
    Although AEC engined they sounded quite different to Met Cam units and had the most awesome exhaust rasp on pullaway.
    They could be seen quite widely well at least on the Midland and Western, though they also reached East Anglia on Birmingham to Norwich and Cambridge workings. Scotland saw them used on Aberdeen to Inverness services for many years.
    Sadly they were an early candidate for withdrawal due to the asbestos situation. Apart from a trailer vehicle none were preserved.

    Class 120 DMU (railcar.co.uk)
    Class 120 DMU set 553 leaving Bristol TM. - YouTube (Audio clip)
     
    • Like Like x 2
  30. theorganist

    theorganist Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2018
    Messages:
    5,565
    Likes Received:
    11,446
    Thanks for linking to that audio clip. What a fantastic sound. I would love to see on in the sim with a suitable route. Bristol to Weymouth would be great to see, extremely unlikely sadly.

    These two examples you have mentioned demonstrate how different classes could be. The class 121 a single car unit with exhaust pipes on one cab end and doors to each seating bay, designed for branch line and suburban operations.

    The class 120 was a very low density "cross country" design, usually run in 3 car sets. Fitted with buffets originally apart from one batch with only two doors per carriage. These were designed for long and middle distance services for example Birmingham to Cardiff.

    The class 122 also has exhausts on one cab end.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  31. dhekelian

    dhekelian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2020
    Messages:
    2,054
    Likes Received:
    2,671
    I take your class 120 Sir and raise you, to the mighty, the glorious 121!



    I do like the class 117 as well, they used to sound like old buses when you got on one but looking back they were iconic imo.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  32. aeronautic237

    aeronautic237 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2022
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    I can see a lot of love for the old DMUs, and while I'm too young to feel the same, I can understand why people miss them now that it has been explained here. Even though they looked (and maybe felt) identical to the travelling public, each still seems to have a charm of their own. Even Dhekelian changed their profile picture to one (which looks great BTW).
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page