The only way an extension will happen is if they either change the way they make routes so that extensions are easier, or offer extensions as part...
I have done, thanks.
I remember someone saying somewhere Cajon Pass was suggested here, albeit a while before it actually came.
Already implemented on Skyhook's MML 158. As for the others, it's because they don't have an AI guard to do it.
Yet, people happily paid again for SEHS.
That's precisely what it is.
It's obvious Rivet struggle with sounds; modelling is their best. Clearly they need help with sounds, and why do DTG give permission for these...
Accounting for inflation, and higher costs nowadays , £29.99 isn't that bad.
A general slider would probably be less work, but some sort of setting is needed, especially for trains such as the London Underground stock where...
Are you finally going to look at sorting the HUD settings so they don't reset every time you exit the game? I like playing with the Minimal HUD...
I never said that, so don't put words into my mouth. I haven't come across another thread even remotely similar to this one, which is where I drew...
Technically, it's more of an East Anglia to London route.
Just wait until September, then it will really get on track.
ECML to York WCL to Plymouth ECW to Ore
I know. They told me when I went for the first one. I did pass some of those tests (even past the national standard on at least two). Bit more...
Perfectly fine. We all have our opinions. Nothing wrong if anyone thinks different.
Either way, to me the sounds are good.
Could it be something like the sounds needing to go through the speaker wire to the speakers (as in, the sound having to travel further) slowing...
The DfT still holds the licenses so it's one way.
Keyword: luxuries. Look it up. You're not he only one on this planet who struggles to afford them.
I'm not a programming expert, but surely the AI guard on MML would provide a good base for a core. A core which should have been there from day 1...
Don't know what you're all whinging about. The sounds are pretty spot on.
Skyhook's MML Class 158 has this. Why they didn't share their secret so it could be applied to other trains is a mystery.
If you don't have the money, you don't have the money. Simple as that. Nothing to do with DTG if you can't manage your spending.
If Fife Circle is set in 2020, they'll be AI at Edinburgh.
If its to be extended to York, then I'd say it'd be a good time to introduce the York to Leeds line.
Put music on in the cab in the UK and you can guarantee you'd be called in for 'tea and biscuits' with the boss.
I was thinking more that this type of route would attract those who like freight.
Would 2 passenger services really matter if its a freight route anyway?
Chances are it won't come (as in it may or may not). Not there's no chance of it coming (which implies I know something which I don't).
Didn't say there was anything to suggest it, but what are the chances really?
It's gotta be the Class 91. Why? For starters, it was highly requested since the ECML came. Also, its use is strictly for ECML services. No other...
Any licensing relating to a defunct TOC would be in the hands of the DfT, who apparently have no problems with licensing.
Still depends on the license as I would presume even without branding the livery itself would need a license. Hopefully that isn't the case but I...
That would probably depend on what said A to B route offers. If its something like SEHS, BML or DRA then it'd be more desirable than, say, ECML.
That depends on the license I think.
Does the fact they have to change the current model count?
Definitely. The more challenging the loco, the more enticing the freight rub.
TVL appealed to me because of the freight aspect, purely because it used the Class 37 and was more than the usual A to B. Whereas most modern UK...
I'm somewhere in the middle. I like both sides, but if it's freight it has to be on a passenger oriented route to make it interesting.
Point being, TSW routes aren't all A to B. I think that's been made clear enough. Does SEHS count? That's technically 2 in 1.
As would East Coastway, BML.
Yeah, but what rush hour route wouldn't have a large number of services? There'd be more of an uproar if those services didn't exist.
I will do, because its not exactly wrong. You'd expect a huge number of services (whether driveable or AI) on a rush hour route, regardless of...
A modern day NTP takes my vote.
'Rush hour' refers more to the number of services.
Sure, if you want to add another 1000 services to an already memory consuming timetable.
Pirating games is illegal. So, yeah. If you really want to, break the law.
It's enough to make it NOT the same.
False hope, yeah. Doesn't do anyone any favours though.
Separate names with a comma.