It's all about where you draw the line. If the paint on the outside is wrong, does it matter? to many of you, it's a deal breaker. If the shape...
Should be fine, but you can't include their logos on the route or anything else to which they own the design (usually things like posters etc)....
Remember - not getting a license, also means unable to get access to the trains. So fundamentally this is about more than just not having a...
They're done by radio on LIRR, nothing on the track. Matt.
No, UGC in the case you're referring to means things generated with the unreal editor. This hasn't used that at all from what I can tell, this is...
I got the impression that had been rather messed up by the recent "upgrade" patch they put out and it was on hold indefinitely while they figure...
I saw my name mentioned, but not really sure I need to add anything to what's been said previously, by myself elsewhere and others in this very...
Indeed. Train Simulator 2013 was the last time we used it - there were a lot of extensive, long, and uh detailed meetings discussing all sorts...
Every project has a deadline from the moment it's conceived - no project can have an unlimited dev plan. I have never worked at any company,...
Are you perhaps thinking of the Ship Simulator that VStep made? Nothing to do with Microsoft - it just used the standard "X Simulator" font that...
We cover US operations pretty extensively on Cajon Pass in the tutorials - I spent a lot of time writing the scripts for them for that reason....
You can have a remaster AND an extension I guess in the same project. So you could say LIRR is an example of both? Matt.
Wouldn't hold your breath i'm afraid - i've had very little time to work on it so it really hasn't gone very far. Matt.
Oh the airport? was originally on the table like Meissen and we laid the track for it etc just like meissen but when it came to measuring progress...
US freight is all about slowly, carefully. Small changes, and a fair bit of waiting :) Matt.
What was extending Dresden Riesa rejected? It hasn't been rejected. It also hasnt been added to a plan. It's just in the mix that's all. Matt.
Remasters we see as re-imagining the original concept - that is to say, same fundamental product, just overhauling scenery and gameplay, trains...
To be fair - sometimes these survey questions are left a little vague purely to find out how YOU would interpret them or what conversations they...
Modular routes is not merging routes to be clear. It was under discussion a long time ago as a potential for easier route building where you can...
thanks - passed on to the team to look in to.
but did it actually say 1st may? some times some things can cause the date to be changed so I just want to rule that out. I'll fire up the game...
Is that based on the same date? Temperature varies by date, time and altitude, and then has a random fudge factor so that all days are not the...
Not in our plans for the foreseeable. Matt.
Mix of things really. Some things that ended up having to take priority (better to deliver 3 features well, than half bake 6) and it all happened...
In what form would that take?
Can you remind me what that issue is and i'll look it up. We do have another round of fixes coming. Matt.
We've been giving updates on suspension and working hard to get it out in an update asap - finalising details on what it means, but I do not...
Access is the block if you want new trains or upgrades to existing ones really, for freight - licensing is much less of a problem on freight as...
Not especially less resources tbh - physics are the same, controls all still need to be there, the model needs to be the same level of detail even...
So for my personal Clinchfield update, I am planning a second modern-era timetable using CSX as well, so that would answer that side of things...
But what would you want done with it?
Far Rock, East Williamston and West Hempstead have never been part of the plan. Considered in project outline and then cut long before anyone...
What platform are you on there docsnyder? Matt.
Pretty sure I have said it yes. Nope. Nope. Nope. Not sure why you all have to jump on the doom wagon but then that is kinda what these...
If I recall, it's a much more fundamental issue - the substitution system really needs a groundup rethink. Within a formation you can say "how...
The US freight substitution thing is a side effect of cargo needing to be re-implemented unfortunately - currently if we enable it, the cars lose...
Wrote a big post, browser refreshed itself and lost it. Lovely. Let me see what I can remember, apologies if this feels a bit like cliff-notes...
Fortunately there were no ramifications from that. Matt.
In all honesty it potentially impacts future products as well - e.g. if I do X to satisfy a license and know full well based on history that...
Ping me a DM dave...
Most welcome - you ask good questions and I enjoy answering them :)
You resimulate it as often as you need to, basically. I know that's perhaps an unhelpful answer but it's because of the cause and effect nature...
Not sure if the image will be updated - but same product either way.
In the case of TSW - we have split trains into a "view" which contains the 3D model, and the "model" which contains the simulation and scripting...
The number of unique rail vehicles is the main factor, particularly moving ones, static in a yard isnt a big issue, but if you have lots of rail...
The M3 that is out now, works on LIRR Commuter, has new scenarios on it, and has services. There is no "new" M3.
I am fairly sure it's down to the number of individually managed rail vehicles and particularly the number of formations in use rather than number...
That would tie up two people and you might get maybe 10% improvement in productivity at best - more likely, it'd drop, because then you need to...
Timetables are one-person jobs. We have more than Joe working on timetables of course, but because it's all done in one file and because of how...
No plans to add it, no. And no it's not a trend. We always try to add what we can, but each timetable has to be evaluated individually and in...
Separate names with a comma.