Do we have to have these same old "DTG can do no wrong, it's all the customer's fault" posts based on no evidence? [Citation needed]
I don't believe DTG's excuse.
You assume that the only way for DTG to make money off annual releases is expanding the playerbase!
I haven't seen any signs the annual release is bringing new players in.
Not to mention NTP is filled with bugs - I don't think they've ever fixed the Mk2 coaches and oil tankers having borked numbers.
Why a response to this thread and not the ones raising issues?
DTG have not proven themselves averse to inconsistent features in the past! This was the excuse used for no announcements in the past as well.
Indeed you can't import your profile if you don't have the files on your computer.
Don't expect an answer from DTG if it's a complaint!
TSC doesn't support differential speed limits IIRC.
Where is this?
Well, I'll believe the future phases when I see them.
Can't be an unreasonably high number, though...
Hardly different to DTG then!
Well yes, that was my point. Of course, each loco will only have a few scenarios where it's playable...
Hypothetically there could be route-specific interactions that cause issues. However, that's already a potential issue with layering.
Hence why "have" was in quotation marks!
But they already "have" to test every version of 146 on every timetable in appears in.
I'm fairly certain that wasn't the case!
They didn't delist the original LIRR, though.
They're in the route .pak file, but are separate within that .pak file.
I strongly doubt there will be any rerouting.
Exactly. DTG promises fixes, never delivers them, then says nothing on the topic.
Well, it could make full-length runs of both the Metro-North routes...
The P32AC-DM most certainly does run into Penn and GCT!
Well, it is raining and overcast. How does it look when it's sunny?
Unfortunately they removed the truth and not the lies.
Yet they repeatedly said during the promotion of SOS, after the release of SOS, and during the promotion of Peak Forest that steam was being...
Why isn't Dovetail sharing them here?
LIRR?
Peak Forest didn't sell because trying to drive unfinished steam locos on an unrealistically empty timetable isn't fun.
A useful reminder of broken promises: https://forums.dovetailgames.com/search/95424736/?q=firing&o=date&c[node]=190&c[user][0]=257
Why do we need a Dovetail Discord?
...we got a loco announcement in it.
Why has Dovetail decided they need a Discord? Are they planning to discontinue the forum?
TSW invariably looks dreadful when it's even slightly overcast, it completely borks the lighting.
Yes, plenty of others worked it out as well. There was an entire thread about it.
The new timetable is set in 2017 though with 387s operating to Hayes & Harlington.
So Dan works for Classic FM? Doubt it's an intentional hint if so.
Is Dan a DTG member?
Unfortunately most third party developers have abandoned Steam - a great shame, because the conditions DTG imposed on third party developers were...
Would the track layout work?
You can get from any London station to any other London station without leaving railway property...
I suggest that Japanese train simulators may be more to your interest.
It might, but then again it might not. You can't be certain with it.
Congratulations, you fell for its hallucinations.
That you got right answers to some questions does not mean you will get the right answers to other questions. And if it's just a tool and you can...
Well, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, which won't be for some time after the announcement.
How do you know that those explanations and translations are accurate?
You used AI to generate that post. I can tell. What makes you think that AI contains accurate information about z-fighting for DLC for a niche...
Separate names with a comma.
