but never to listen nor warn Rivet to make actual quality content. Even so far all if not most of Rivet's content have been really sloppy. (And...
does the South Wales Coastal and or Welsh Marches comes with this class 70?...
you know what sucks, the fact that DLCs that I want are made by Rivet. Like what am I meant to do. I want to get something for TSW because i am...
on another note, semi-related to TSW since both games run on the same game engine. Wonders of Sodor is doing so well me thinks. Not being able to...
what are the odds that a mod is secretly watching us right now, about to delete our messages the moment we complain about anything as a result of...
oh yea, the whole big bag of "TSW is meant for console but everything is tested on PC and console players keep getting so many bugs" in this day...
its the same old same old and the dev refuses to listen. We need to stop letting Rivet touch anything related to TSW. They have ruined the 377/3...
where???
no new routes thats for sure.
image??? or are you bluffing
thought i do a little update on this got myself a hall class and MK1 pullman from PLD! [ATTACH] - [ATTACH]
oh, so thats false advertising then lmao.
what other engine you look forward to the most? (at least ones that isnt show in game yet) also hi Train Sim Society!
incorrect carriage numbers
waiting for hundreds of engine, gameplay, cargo packs... sold at a premium
i personally wont buy them. but i do agree that additional liveries should've been free. Unless you have a big pack like the HST farewell pack....
i think that is called a gameplay pack. (i dont think they like free liveries and will always lock them behind paywall much like the TSC market...
i havent bought the Northampton loop from ATS yet. But when that comes out on steam which one do i still buy next?
Especially the MK3s... TGS (both GWE and EMT) give us a guards interior for proper guard mode (the latter has the interior modeled but cant access...
without having to get into another argument. if yall disagree that is fine, but much like another creator like Train Sim Society have said, you'd...
yes. if DC4260's review on their 170 is anything to go by.
at least i am really really sure that seaford and ore diagrams from brighton do still have guards i am for sure they do. based on rivet's track...
i can tell you that guards do exist on services out of Brighton. (excluding Thameslink). I am a Brighton local so I know.
what on the 313 is going to be improved? how are the 377s (i hope this will be applied to the BML 377, apparently the ECW and BML 377 are...
apparently the MK3s arent the only train who has wrong/incorrect carriage number placements... yikes...
ahh i see. thank you
[ATTACH] There are no MK3s that are based under the 43XXX number, ever only 42XXX (for TSO) or 44XXX (for TGS) for some reason every MK3 coach is...
they had better fix those TOPs number on their 805 before release otherwise i am never buying anything from AAB again.
i conducted more test and i even removed 5W18 from the scenario. But it still made no different. NR6000 is still red, but in the other test it...
and in the end, it will always be left up to the players to sort themselves out for branding, bug, passenger varaint patches. And if anyone have...
so the diagram is this. [ATTACH] what is suppose to happen is that 1R15 is meant to pass Rugby platform 5, followed by 1R16 and 1R17 (which are...
okay good news everyone, there was indeed a a.i causing the fuss. 1R06 was apparently set to go to the wrong portal that i never realised until...
you're not helping...[ATTACH] if i remember the modifications were made to 1R08 and 1R10, thats it. 1R08 meets the player between bletchley and...
it shouldn't have happened. As i repeated many times, 1H04 was not suppose to stop at that red signal and the player train would get the go ahead...
nope it was red. the a.i train has no instruction to stop at that signal at all. I dont know whats wrong. the problem is that it shouldn't have...
the second picture was the player train rear ending the a.i train. would you mind if you can help take a look at the scenario to see what is wrong?
the train is suppose to end outside of Rugby/Wolston. This literally has not happened before and I dont know what was changed to make it like...
is it just me or have many products from SSS been removed or delisted? I swear I remember they use to have a lot more in the carriage pack...
and there it is. this is what i am talking about people being so dismissive about the problem that is yet and should've been corrected...
its one coach. Exterior details on roof and undercarriage (if there are any difference), most of the body doesnt even need changing, reuse the...
but then this just results in a paid update... that is if they include a improved class 801... otherwise we will have to wait for god knows how...
i never knew this issue until recently as well, and only now i check the model myself according to LNER's seat map. In game is A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I....
recently I had watched one of Train Sim Society's video in a part where they say there are people who would just ignore issues or valid...
i dont know when this issue had popped up. this happen every so often with the electrostars is not even funny. (Last time it was with the 377/4,...
okay so i cant remember where or which exact video that I have recently watch from Train Sim Society. And now that i think about it, how is this...
i swore didnt one happen couple months ago?
just to archive this current 2025 Christmas sale prices for some add-ons. MTU HST: £17.99 (original price: £29.99) Valenta HST: £24.99 (£20.99 if...
okay so when buying steam stuff just now i have only learn apparently that North London and Goblin Line actually also includes the North London...
its a Christmas miracle [ATTACH]
huh i thought they had updated some other things as well on the 180 model?
Separate names with a comma.
