RAW data, only numbers. EDIT Maximum Selectable Responses: 3 I've updated my table, in preparation for the upcoming RT update & HHL. Because of many controversies around it (HHL) I want to make an in-details review. OK, I am just bored The starting point for my considerations is a comparison. Check scores in detail sheet for some interesting (?) numbers. Most importantly - each Route DLC is treated as the first and only purchase. It doesn't matter how much one BR 182 is similar to another BR 182 from this perspective. There are six criteria: 1. Synergies. How often this route is a layer. 2. Traffic. A maximum number of services with all layers active (HMA max is PC only). Payware included. 3. Services (variety). 1 point for each: S-Bahn, Regional, IC, ICE, freight, switching. Payware included. 4. Services (base content). As above, but only DLC-included types of services. 5. Trains. Variety of trains / usable trains. Payware included. 6. Trains (base content). As above, but only DLC-included types of trains. Every score is a comparison: This route value /divide/ maximum possible value in all DLCs (vs best value). In %. These numbers will be multiplied by the weights - that's what the poll applies to I will apply a similar rule - the largest number of votes is equal to 1. EDIT or direct % value At the top is a small summary - two categories: value per money & trainspotting value. The second one is about how potentially rich in a variety a given route is. Payware included. Sure it would be difficult to give logical reasons for some of the possible choices, but such mechanisms taking place there so decided DTG. I just want to put these numbers together. Without any conversion factors - the content of individual DLCs seems well-balanced. Thx in advance. BR o7 PS As I said, I am bored EDIT 1 No additional points for DoSto liveries / No additional points for 185.2 liveries I am considering extra points for a Loco Add-On home routes
Theoretically, yes - but a few people have already voted. Although, you're right ... I changed to two EDIT OK, it seems logical. 1 point for each sub-category. Changed.
