London, Tilbury And Southend Line (1990s)

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by Aussierailfan, Jan 21, 2024.

  1. Aussierailfan

    Aussierailfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2020
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    953
    About
    The London, Tilbury and Southend line, also known as Essex Thameside, is a commuter railway line on the British railway system. It connects Fenchurch Street station, in central London, with destinations in east London and Essex, including Barking, Upminster, Basildon, Grays, Tilbury, Southend and Shoeburyness. The Line is 39 miles 40 chains (63.6 km).

    Following re-signalling, the separation of the District Line and electrification the first electric timetable commenced operation in June 1962. The off-peak timetable consisted of six trains per hour on a repeating pattern timetable. The departures were:

    xx:00 Fenchurch Street to Southend & Shoeburyness fast service via Laindon - first stop Upminster for connection to Grays via Ockenden then Leigh-on -sea then all stations
    xx:05 Fenchurch Street to Southend & Shoeburyness all stations via Tilbury Riverside (reverse)
    xx:10 Fenchurch Street to Southend & Shoeburyness all stations via Laindon
    xx:30 Fenchurch Street to Southend & Shoeburyness fast service via Laindon - first stop Barking then Benfleet and all stations
    xx:35 Fenchurch Street to Southend & Shoeburyness all stations via Tilbury Riverside (reverse) except Stepney East
    xx:40 Fenchurch Street to Southend & Shoeburyness all stations via Laindon
    The morning peak saw 24 arrivals between 7:45 a.m. and 9:15 a.m. with a fast journey time from Southend of 48 minutes. Of note were two trains using the Tilbury avoiding line and offering Stanford-le-hope passengers radically improved journey times.

    In the evening peak between 4:30 pm and 6:30 pm there were 29 departures, with the fastest journey time to Southend being the 6:00 pm, marketed as "the Spiv" taking 44 minutes with stops at Leigh-on-Sea, Benfleet and Westcliff.

    [​IMG]

    Rollingstock
    Passenger
    [​IMG]

    Class 302

    [​IMG]
    Class 310

    [​IMG]
    Class 312

    Freight
    [​IMG]

    class 56

    [​IMG]
    Class 59

    [​IMG]
    Class 90
     
    • Like Like x 5
  2. finlayl122528

    finlayl122528 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2023
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    708
    I would prefer if this route was set in the modern day
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Aussierailfan

    Aussierailfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2020
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    953
    well, I prefer it set in the era I chose in this suggestion. Am personally sick of modern-day stuff. having a variety of both is very important to make everyone happy.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. finlayl122528

    finlayl122528 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2023
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    708
    I understand. The routes in the past may bring back memories for some or it may just be a piece of train heritage that transport fans are interested in
     
  5. matt#4801

    matt#4801 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2022
    Messages:
    5,659
    Likes Received:
    10,276
    Fabulous suggestion, would be great to have some older AC stuff in game along with a 90s route.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Wivenswold

    Wivenswold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2017
    Messages:
    1,605
    Likes Received:
    2,831
    Older trains probably suit those who like to have more to do on a journey.
    I tend to drive newer traction when I don't want to think too much, BML is good for that. When I want to totally immerse myself in a drive, I will pick something older and more involved.

    TSW should have a good mix of new and old, perhaps slightly weighted in favour of new so as to encourage a new generation of rail simmers.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. finlayl122528

    finlayl122528 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2023
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    708
    I agree. I personally like modern routes but they need to suit everyone's desires I suppose
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page