Gameplay Niddertalbahn Modern Timetable - Released

Discussion in 'PC Editor Discussion' started by Perks390, Oct 23, 2023.

  1. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Released
    I am happy to say that the timetable is finally released! It's available to download here:
    https://www.trainsimcommunity.com/m...reations/i4165-niddertalbahn-modern-timetable
    Please leave any feedback or suggestions in this thread and I'll do my best to implement what I can.

    Original:
    I thought a good route to get a hang of the timetable editor would be Niddertalbahn. I'm getting started on creating a modern day (2022-23) timetable, I intend to use the 642 when that gets released but until then the 628 will be placeholder. I aim to get AI traffic into the timetable, Bad Vilbel will be the biggest challenge as it has regular S-Bahn, regional and IC/ICE services calling and passing through. Intially, the focus will be getting all the player services in and making sure that works.

    I've got my first service in the timetable but already I'm having issues after a simulation whereby it's stuck at Eichen.

    The other thing I'm unsure of is where trains are stabled overnight? There's about 5 services that start their day at Stockheim but I'm guessing the stock isn't stabled there overnight, does anyone know where the stock comes from in the morning?
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2024
    • Like Like x 5
  2. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I'm very confused as to why the train is getting stuck at Eichen, the path is set for the train and the instruction is set up the same as all the rest. In the spoiler is the relevent part of the log file.
    upload_2023-10-23_18-26-1.png upload_2023-10-23_18-29-32.png
    TS2Editor: TOD: +04:23:41.250, Progress: 7.10%, Avg Frame Time: 0.41ms, Total Time: +00:00:38, Active Services: 1
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 0 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    LogTSWAI: AI has been stopped for 60.049370s
    LogTSWAI: TS2AIController::LogTargetConditionStatus: [TOD] +04:24:39.700, [TargetSpeedCondition] Stop Arrived at Instruction, [Service] RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel, [Location] Lat: 50.28329, Lon: 8.94316, [CurrentVelocity] 0.00m/s
    TS2Dispatcher: Status for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel: Acquired (entered) route 3 from FAST_F to FAST_B, Acquired route 0 from FAST_B to FECH_F, Acquired route 1 from FECH_F to FECH_B2, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B2 to FECH_B,
    TS2: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel completed instruction (LoadUnload) 6 at 2023.10.20-04.25.00
    TS2: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel started instruction 7 at 2023.10.20-04.25.00
    TS2Dispatcher: SetSignalAspect FAST_B from Hp1 to Hp0 (showing Hp1 previously showing Hp0), route ix: 0, Junction(s) Set, occupation count: 1
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 0 (13) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Requesting route 0 at signal FECH_B to signal FHWD_B for service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 0 (31) on route 0 for signal FECH_B to signal FHWD_B for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 1 (32) on route 0 for signal FECH_B to signal FHWD_B for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Assigning route 0 at signal FECH_B to signal FHWD_B for service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: SetSignalAspect FECH_B from Hp0 to Hp1 (showing Hp0 previously showing Hp1), route ix: 0, Junction(s) Set, occupation count: 0
    TS2Dispatcher: SetSignalAspect FECH_B2 from Hp0 to Hp1 (showing Hp0 previously showing Hp1), route ix: 0, Junction(s) Set, occupation count: 0
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 1 (14) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    LogTS2PassengerInfoSystem: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel is departing from marker Altenstadt (Hess) Platform 1 .
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 3 (12) on route 2 for signal FAST_DEx to signal FAST_B
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 3 (12) on route 2 for signal FAST_DEx to signal FAST_B for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 0 (13) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing route 0 at signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F for service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 0 (13) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 2 (15) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 3 (16) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 4 (17) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 1 (14) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 1 (14) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 3 (16) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 2 (15) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 3 (16) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 5 (18) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Editor: TOD: +04:25:56.150, Progress: 7.27%, Avg Frame Time: 0.37ms, Total Time: +00:00:39, Active Services: 1
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 4 (17) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 4 (17) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Level Crossing LevelCrossingAltenstadtMain for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel. New Acquisition Count: 0
    TS2Dispatcher: Level crossing Level Crossing Altenstadt Main @ Lat: 50.28316, Lon: 8.93996 transitioning from state ELevelCrossingState::Closed to state ELevelCrossingState::opening (after 0.996094.2 seconds)
    TS2Dispatcher: Level crossing Level Crossing Altenstadt Main @ Lat: 50.28316, Lon: 8.93996 transitioning from state ELevelCrossingState::opening to state ELevelCrossingState::open (after 2.988281.2 seconds)
    TS2Dispatcher: Level crossing LevelCrossingAltenstadtMain reached sleep state. Acqusition count: 0
    LogTS2PassengerInfoSystem: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel is approaching marker Höchst (Nidder) Platform 1 and is stopping there.
    TS2Editor: TOD: +04:28:00.250, Progress: 7.42%, Avg Frame Time: 0.40ms, Total Time: +00:00:40, Active Services: 1
    LogTS2PassengerInfoSystem: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel is departing from marker Höchst (Nidder) Platform 1.
    TS2: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel arrived at instruction 7 at 2023.10.20-04.28.20
    TS2: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel completed instruction(Go To) 7 at 2023.10.20-04.28.20
    TS2: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel started instruction 8 at 2023.10.20-04.28.20
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 0 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 0 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Trigger door lock state 1 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel completed instruction (LoadUnload) 8 at 2023.10.20-04.29.00
    TS2: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel started instruction 9 at 2023.10.20-04.29.00
    LogTS2PassengerInfoSystem: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel is approaching marker Höchst (Nidder) Platform 1 and is passing thru.
    LogTS2PassengerInfoSystem: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel is departing from marker Höchst (Nidder) Platform 1.
    TS2Editor: TOD: +04:30:06.850, Progress: 7.58%, Avg Frame Time: 0.39ms, Total Time: +00:00:41, Active Services: 1
    LogTS2PassengerInfoSystem: Service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel is approaching marker Eichen (Nidder) Platform 1 and is stopping there.
    TS2Dispatcher: SetSignalAspect FECH_F from Hp1 to Hp0 (showing Hp1 previously showing Hp0), route ix: 1, Junction(s) Set, occupation count: 1
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 0 (19) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Requesting route 2 at signal FHWD_B to signal FHWD_N4 for service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 0 (33) on route 2 for signal FHWD_B to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 1 (34) on route 2 for signal FHWD_B to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquired Level Crossing LevelCrossingKm194 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel. New Acquisition Count: 1
    TS2Dispatcher: Assigning route 1 on (shunt) signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} as part of route 2 on signal: FHWD_B
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 0 (35) on route 1 for signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 1 (36) on route 1 for signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 2 (37) on route 1 for signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 3 (38) on route 1 for signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 4 (39) on route 1 for signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 5 (40) on route 1 for signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquiring Section: 6 (41) on route 1 for signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquired route 1 at signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel setting junctions
    TS2Dispatcher: Acquired route 2 at signal FHWD_B to signal FHWD_N4 for service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel setting level crossings
    TS2Dispatcher: Level crossing Level Crossing Km 19.4 @ Lat: 50.23596, Lon: 8.87754 transitioning from state ELevelCrossingState::open to state ELevelCrossingState::Warning (after 0.996094.2 seconds)
    TS2Dispatcher: Setting junction {1735A9E8-4017-6080-EF8C-5E9A03C16CF4} to state 1 for service [RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel] due to route acquisition
    TS2Dispatcher: Setting junction {9919A379-412E-31FD-DDF5-8DAEABA2995C} to state 1 for service [RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel] due to route acquisition
    TS2Dispatcher: Setting junction {F88A90C1-43B7-22A6-2732-EB89555E0237} to state 1 for service [RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel] due to route acquisition
    TS2Dispatcher: Setting junction {1735A9E8-4017-6080-EF8C-5E9A03C16CF4} to state 1 for service [RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel] due to route acquisition
    TS2Dispatcher: Setting junction {9919A379-412E-31FD-DDF5-8DAEABA2995C} to state 1 for service [RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel] due to route acquisition
    TS2Dispatcher: Setting junction {F88A90C1-43B7-22A6-2732-EB89555E0237} to state 1 for service [RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel] due to route acquisition
    TS2Dispatcher: Assigning route 1 at signal {DFB11927-4E50-F154-6C4F-2DA688A6B3BC} to signal FHWD_N4 for services: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: SetSignalAspect from Hp0 to Sh1 (showing Hp0 previously showing Sh1), route ix: 1, Junction(s) Set, occupation count: 0
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 5 (18) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 5 (18) on route 0 for signal FAST_B to signal FECH_F for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 1 (20) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Level crossing Level Crossing Km 19.4 @ Lat: 50.23596, Lon: 8.87754 transitioning from state ELevelCrossingState::Warning to state ELevelCrossingState::Closing (after 5.976562.2 seconds)
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 0 (19) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing route 1 at signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 0 (19) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 2 (21) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 3 (22) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Level crossing Level Crossing Km 19.4 @ Lat: 50.23596, Lon: 8.87754 transitioning from state ELevelCrossingState::Closing to state ELevelCrossingState::Closed (after 5.976562.2 seconds)
    TS2Dispatcher: Level crossing LevelCrossingKm194 reached sleep state. Acqusition count: 1
    TS2Dispatcher: Assigning route 2 at signal FHWD_B to signal FHWD_N4 for services: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: SetSignalAspect FHWD_B from Hp0 to Hp2 (showing Hp0 previously showing Hp2), route ix: 2, Junction(s) Set, occupation count: 0
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 1 (20) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 1 (20) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 4 (23) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 2 (21) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 2 (21) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 3 (22) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 3 (22) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 5 (24) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 6 (25) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 4 (23) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 4 (23) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 5 (24) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 5 (24) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 7 (26) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 6 (25) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 6 (25) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel entered section 8 (27) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Service: RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel exited section 7 (26) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2
    TS2Dispatcher: Releasing Section: 7 (26) on route 1 for signal FECH_F to signal FECH_B2 for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel
    TS2Editor: TOD: +04:32:05.150, Progress: 7.73%, Avg Frame Time: 0.42ms, Total Time: +00:00:42, Active Services: 1
    LogTSWAI: AI has been stopped for 60.049370s
    LogTSWAI: TS2AIController::LogTargetConditionStatus: [TOD] +04:32:32.700, [TargetSpeedCondition] Stop Destination, [Service] RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel, [Location] Lat: 50.25572, Lon: 8.91722, [CurrentVelocity] 0.00m/s
    TS2Dispatcher: Status for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel: Acquired (entered) route 1 from FECH_F to FECH_B2, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B2 to FECH_B, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B to FHWD_B, Acquired route 2 from FHWD_B to FHWD_N4,
    LogTSWAI: AI has been stopped for 120.102730s
    LogTSWAI: TS2AIController::LogTargetConditionStatus: [TOD] +04:33:32.750, [TargetSpeedCondition] Stop Destination, [Service] RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel, [Location] Lat: 50.25572, Lon: 8.91722, [CurrentVelocity] 0.00m/s
    TS2Dispatcher: Status for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel: Acquired (entered) route 1 from FECH_F to FECH_B2, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B2 to FECH_B, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B to FHWD_B, Acquired route 2 from FHWD_B to FHWD_N4,
    LogTSWAI: AI has been stopped for 180.156387s
    LogTSWAI: TS2AIController::LogTargetConditionStatus: [TOD] +04:34:32.800, [TargetSpeedCondition] Stop Destination, [Service] RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel, [Location] Lat: 50.25572, Lon: 8.91722, [CurrentVelocity] 0.00m/s
    TS2Dispatcher: Status for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel: Acquired (entered) route 1 from FECH_F to FECH_B2, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B2 to FECH_B, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B to FHWD_B, Acquired route 2 from FHWD_B to FHWD_N4,
    TS2Editor: TOD: +04:34:34.900, Progress: 7.92%, Avg Frame Time: 0.33ms, Total Time: +00:00:43, Active Services: 1
    LogTSWAI: AI has been stopped for 240.210052s
    LogTSWAI: TS2AIController::LogTargetConditionStatus: [TOD] +04:35:32.850, [TargetSpeedCondition] Stop Destination, [Service] RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel, [Location] Lat: 50.25572, Lon: 8.91722, [CurrentVelocity] 0.00m/s
    TS2Dispatcher: Status for service RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel: Acquired (entered) route 1 from FECH_F to FECH_B2, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B2 to FECH_B, Acquired route 0 from FECH_B to FHWD_B, Acquired route 2 from FHWD_B to FHWD_N4,
    LogTSWAI: AI has been stopped for 300.250214s
     
  3. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Still struggling to understand why the train is essentially stuck, I've tried removing instructions from the timetable to see if it was a certain station causing issues but the problem just moves elsewhere. Having now relinked everything the train won't even leave the initial station. The log just says the following:
    LogTSWAI: AI has been stopped for 240.210052s
    LogTSWAI: TS2AIController::LogTargetConditionStatus: [TOD] +04:35:32.850, [TargetSpeedCondition] Stop Destination, [Service] RB 34 (15701) - Stockheim to Bad Vilbel

    Does anyone have any ideas what "Stop Destination" means for target speed condition? Any help/suggestions are most welcome.

    EDIT - Managed to get the issue sorted by deleting half the instructions and re-adding them. No idea what I managed to do to cause it to do what it did.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2023
  4. atpyatt

    atpyatt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2020
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    314
    Sometimes I see services get stuck when the go to condition is set to "overlap" rather than "within" for a platform.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    The first diagram is now in the timetable and succesfully simulated, once you get the first service set up the process onwards is a lot quicker with being able to copy, paste and then adjust the timings with the propagation tool. I've split the layers up into 245 and 642 operated services, 245 services will be utilizing double 628s until a suitable loco is released (218 or 245) and I'm intially setting 642 services up with 628s but will replace these when the 642 is releasd.

    One of the interesting things with the 245 diagrams is they join two together, after morning peak, in Frankfurt and then they'll operate the evening peak RB34/RB48 service to Stockheim and Nidda which split at Bad Vilbel. I've managed to get two diagrams (one of the diagrams is the morning peak service from Nidda, which is AI only) to join in the Frankfurt Portal and then they'll return to Bad Vilbel and split with the respective services going to their destinations. There's two services in the evening which do this, so they'll both be in there.

    I'm very happy the editor has been released with timetable tool, it's something I've been wanting to put utilise for a while. Intially, I was planning ECW but thought it would be a little ambitious for a first attempt. Must say that I'm very impressed with how Joe managed to get London - Brighton timetable together and working, figuring out the diagrams for this timetable was time consuming enough!

    Couple of images below of the first diagram in the editor and the diagrams I got together in Excel.
    upload_2023-10-26_19-17-56.png upload_2023-10-26_19-24-38.png
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I've hit a bit of a stumbling block in the timetable now, I've got an issue with a train stopping before the Frankfurt Portal with error of "Stop Off Path", wasn't sure if the portal joins were causing problems but I've removed these and it still gets stuff in the same location. The service with this issue is an AI RB 48 (this later joins one of the other services) from Karben GG Portal which is routed through platform 4 as a via point (for some reason, it sets the direct through as being through platform 3) and then to Frankfurt Portal. This service was previously working so I don't understand why its suddenly stopped working.
     
  7. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Managed to fix the issue with the RB 48 AI, I changed the formation from a single 628 to a double 628 at some point and for some reason this broke it. Took me about 2 days to discovered what the issue was, but now I've changed it back to a single 628 it's happy. After a few other changes and trying to figure out how call-on dependency works, I've now got all the 245 diagrams into the timetable. The first 642 diagram is also in, and now I'm working on the second diagram which involves a lot of splitting and joining. Very satisfying but also very frustrating at times! :mad::)
     
  8. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    So now all the player services are in the timetable, excluding a few more obscure services, fixed a few issues with splits/joins which cropped up.
    A new issue I face now is one of the services which terminates at Bad Vilbel is locking a route up at Stockheim (despite having completed the service and being stabled at Bad Vilbel, the opposite end of the route), preventing any trains entering platform 1. Tried the usual tricks of deleting the service and readding it but no use. Looks like this might be another issue I get stuck on for quite some time. The service locking up the route had previously split in Stockheim, so possibly it's related to that?

    Work calls for now, so I'll give it another go tomorrow.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    All the player services are now in the timetable and simulated. The 628 struggles keeping to the 642 timings so there is a small ripple delay throughout each service as they progress but only by a couple of minutes. Hopefully, once the 642 is out they manage to keep to the timings a bit better but it might just be the case that real life timings are very tight with it being a busy branch. Work has now started on the AI at Bad Vilbel.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. mkraehe#6051

    mkraehe#6051 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2022
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    2,235
    I'm afraid it's probably not just the 628... The top speed on the route was raised to 80 km/h somewhere between the time that TSW Niddertalbahn is set in and today.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    That's something I wasn't aware of. Thankfully, the delays don't tend to be more than around 2-5 minutes (fairly good for DB standards) and most of the time they'll recover this with the longer stops at crossover locations.
     
  12. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    A bit of an update on timetable progress. All the S-bahn services are now in at Bad Vilbel, intially I made up majority 8-car sets and then added some 12-cars in for the peaks as they do in real life (I believe the 8-cars gain an extra unit at Friedberg). Annoyingly, I ended up having more portal issues where the trains were reporting as being off path and locking up the whole timetable. This issue only affected the 12-car sets, so for now I've had to make them all 8-car and maybe in the future I'll see if there's anyway to fix the issue.
    I've now started putting the RB40/RB41 services into the timetable using a mixure of 7&8 car Talents (two units in multi) but again I've been hit by the portal issue whereby any 7 or 8 car Talent won't enter the portal but 3 or 4 car Talents will. Once I get the timetable to a state whereby the Bad Vilbel services are all in, I'll get a timelapse video put together to share.
     
  13. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I've managed to fix the portal issue, which means the S-Bahn now has 12-car services again and I've had no issues getting all the other AI services in too. The passenger AI at Bad Vilbel is now complete and simulated (with the exception of the HLB RE98/99 and IC2 services, due to lack of stock). Freight is something I intend to add in last, as I'll need to get some research done on what freight passes through Bad Vilbel and Nidderau. I've linked a video showing around 90 mins of AI traffic at Bad Vilbel, sped up at 5x speed within the editor. You'll no doubt notice some issues within the video, if there is any you spot which aren't listed below then, please, let me know!


    Bad Vilbel AI issues:
    • Platform 1 stopping locations
    • Formation driving directions (some 146 services are being driven from the back)
    • Minor time adjustments to overtaking services required
    Also shown are three screenshots of the various layers. You'll see just how many S-Bahn services there are throughout the day and how straightforward the ICE services were to add.
    642 Layer.PNG S-Bahn layer.PNG ICE-T Layer.PNG
     
    • Like Like x 4
  14. stateoftheartjonas

    stateoftheartjonas Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2023
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    105
    Amazing!!

    There are some nice community-made repaints of Dostos and the 146.5 for IC2 services, maybe it's possible to use those somehow? :)

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I believe it's not currently possible to use creators club liveries in the editor. In the future if a livery becomes available as a .pak and the editor is able to use these (which it can't currently) then I'll more than happily add them in. Same applies if the SBB flirt is reskinned into HLB livery.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Spent the afternoon tidying up the AI at Bad Vilbel, a few places had the incorrect timings. Also added in a weedkiller player train with the 204, which I've set to run in May. I've based it off an image I found of a similar train on the line, I've had to make a couple of changes to the rolling stock used but hopefully it still looks good!
    https://www.bahnbilder.de/bild/deut...5419/db-fahrwegdienste-212-093-9-und-212.html
    Weedkiller.PNG
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. mkraehe#6051

    mkraehe#6051 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2022
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    2,235
    That's a cool idea! German routes are pretty much missing the more unusual services that British routes tend to get, so I love to see this. Can we get a mint 628 railtour too?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    That's a good idea, I'll look into getting one added!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. Task

    Task Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2020
    Messages:
    336
    Likes Received:
    984
    Can't you just use the 101 and IC1 coaches for the IC2 services for now?
     
  20. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I likely will do. I haven't built that layer yet, I intend to build all the layers so as stock becomes available I can easily add it in. I was hoping that by the time it comes to publishing the timetable there might be a way to put a IC2 reskinned 146+Dosto in.
    For the HLB services through Nidderau, which are normally 1440 operated, I'll just use a Talent 2 instead. I could also do the same for RE98/99 services?
     
    • Like Like x 2
  21. mkraehe#6051

    mkraehe#6051 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2022
    Messages:
    1,005
    Likes Received:
    2,235
    If you backdate the whole thing by just one year, DB Talent II Sets are actually completely prototypical for RB49.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  22. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I think I'm gonna release it as a modern timetable rather than a set 2023 timetable. Once a 218 gets released, I'll use them for the 245 operated Dosto services. Gives me a bit more creative license!
     
    • Like Like x 4
  23. Fawx

    Fawx Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2023
    Messages:
    1,930
    Likes Received:
    4,422
    Question. How do you increase the speed the editor runs at?
     
  24. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    In the console, use 'slowmo' then enter a number after it. Matt mentioned going above 5 starts being unreliable.
     
  25. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Not a whole lot to update on with the timetable as I've been busy moving house and only just got my PC set up. 642s have been added into the timetable now and simulated with only 1 error I need to get fixed. Once that's fixed I'll get the AI at Stockheim added in along with a 628 seasonal railtour!
     
    • Like Like x 2
  26. captaingunadeep

    captaingunadeep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2020
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    267
  27. bodensee#8535

    bodensee#8535 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2023
    Messages:
    326
    Likes Received:
    85
    will u make the max speed higher? because u are not able to hold the timetables with the current high speed on that route
     
  28. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    No, there are no changes to the route or line speed. Despite the lower line speed, trains only lose about 2-3 overall which I'm not concerned about.
     
  29. jezzdabezz#1712

    jezzdabezz#1712 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2022
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    38
    I mean you could just pretend that you aren't speeding, when the limit is 60 imagine that the actual speed limit is 80, I think you can even increase the speed of AI to compensate *I'm not an expert*
     
  30. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Based on the simulation, I'm not really concerned about the difference in line speed as everything is effected. With the dwell times at some of the passing points, most of the time gets recovered anyway.
     
  31. DJsnapattack

    DJsnapattack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2020
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    1,589
    How far off are you from releasing the timetable now .? :)
     
  32. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I've put no work into it for about a month now, due to real life being busy. It's unlikely I'll release it until the editor is updated with the cooking fix (I'm aware there's a work around, which I may consider looking into). In terms of what is left to do:
    • IC2 services - I'll see if I can get them working with the reskin above, if not I'll use the 101.
    • Stockheim AI - Should be pretty straightforward.
    • Freight AI
    • 628 railtour
     
    • Like Like x 1
  33. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Small progress update
    • Stockheim AI is now in and simulated, I've used DB 642s for this as a replacement for the HLB 648s.
    • Nidderau passenger AI is now all in, I didn't realise I hadn't finished doing it (whoops).
    Planned next:
    • IC2 services using 101
    • 628 railtour
    • Freight AI
    If anyone has any useful references or information about the frequency and types of freight at Bad Vilbel and Nidderau, it would be very helpful as I'm yet to research it.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  34. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Small update on progress:
    • IC2 services are in using the 101.
    • 628 railtour has been added for the month of July, I could change it so it runs throughout summer.
    All that's left to do is add in the AI freight services at Bad Vilbel and Nidderau. I'll probably also add in the HLB Flirt Services in a layer so any future rolling stock can be placed in pretty quickly.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  35. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Only freight left to put into the timetable now, I plan on making Nidderau very busy with freight traffic. Despite having worked on this project for many months now, I've never actually done a full run of the route with the timetable until today. Some screenshots from the run below, no idea why some of the terrain hasn't loaded in correctly in some of them.
    SS1.PNG SS2.PNG SS3.PNG ss4.PNG
     
    • Like Like x 4
  36. hp1+vr2

    hp1+vr2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2023
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    31
    still the bad 628.2 there. thats not modern.
     
  37. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    It's the railtour service. The 628 is also used for the 245 operated services to provide more variety.
     
  38. hp1+vr2

    hp1+vr2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2023
    Messages:
    121
    Likes Received:
    31
    i hope TSG to release the 218 in 2024 quartal 4 . so we dont need to drive the 628 to long.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  39. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I've started to attempt to put freight into the timetable but naturally I've hit a problem. The editor won't allow me to route southbound freight trains through platform 1 at Nidderau (Heldenbergen-Windecken), it comes up with an electrification error despite already having various electric trains routed the exact same way. I instructions were even copied from one of the working services. Any ideas on the cause it welcome, I've tried using both 185 and Vectron formations.
    Freight.PNG RB49.PNG
    EDIT - It seems loco hauled electric trains, all have the same issue but EMUs are fine. Are they set up differently somehow?
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2024
  40. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    A further addition to this, what I said in my edit isn't true as I've remembered that I've got local hauled regional trains running. It appears to be an issue with train length. Still trying to figure out a work around for it, which doesn't involve routing everything through platform 2.

    So, the issue appears to be that any locos where the RVD has electrification requirements set up, doesn't work.
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2024
  41. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    The good news is that the timetable is in a position where I'm happy to release it. The bad news is that despite spending many hours trying to use the cooking work around, I cannot get it to cook. So until DTG sorts out the cooking issue, you'll just have to make do with a couple of screenshots.
    SS1.PNG SS2.PNG SS3.PNG ss4.PNG ss5.PNG
     
    • Like Like x 8
  42. captaingunadeep

    captaingunadeep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2020
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    267
    Why not join TSC discord where people are always ready to help will give you a way to sort out your problem
     
    • Like Like x 1
  43. captaingunadeep

    captaingunadeep Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2020
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    267
  44. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    I'm already on there and occasionally ask for help. If I make no progress and ask for some more.
     
  45. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Good news!
    The timetable is now available to download and play. I'm very happy with what I've managed to achieve and the stop start nature of the route makes the 642 a nice addition to it. I'd like to thank everyone on this forum and TSC Discord who have given me advice throughout this project. If anyone has any further suggestions, or help with fixing some of the known issues, you're more than welcome to say.
    https://www.trainsimcommunity.com/m...reations/i4165-niddertalbahn-modern-timetable
    20240116201814_1.jpg 20240116202220_1.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 21
  46. stateoftheartjonas

    stateoftheartjonas Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2023
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    105
    Just played my first modern service and loved it, thank you! :love:
    Do you have a recommended 642 livery to go with your modern timetable?
     
  47. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    Someone on the TSC Discord (Hannah) is kindly working on a RMV Pack which will add the correct logos onto the 642 and 423.
    I intend to update the timetable at some point next week to fix the issues with PIS all showing S6 and the arrival times not working correctly.
     
    • Like Like x 5
  48. tokio#8329

    tokio#8329 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2024
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    6
    Hello,
    thanks for your work and this additional stuff!
    But everytime i start a service (modern Niddertalbahn), the game crashes. Game is running on Steam. Both DLCs are installed and everything else is working...
    Some ideas, what i'm doing wrong?
     
  49. Perks390

    Perks390 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2016
    Messages:
    353
    Likes Received:
    433
    It's possible I might have missed out a layer tag somewhere, is there any German DLC you don't own? The layers use KWG, HBK, KAH, MAG, 101, and Vectron. I'll be removing the MAG requirement in the next update.
     
  50. tokio#8329

    tokio#8329 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2024
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    6
    Thx for your reply. Yep i am missing KWG and HBK. So i have to buy them.
     

Share This Page