It would be good to have a spreadsheet like a X axis and y axis style with routes/locos on one side and features on the other to help state what’s intended to work for each route, as sometimes something appears as a bug cause it works elsewhere but sometimes it’s because a route hasn’t been updated for that if it’s a yes (eg: AWS on Great Western Express) have a tick If it’s not there (eg: Peninsular Corridor Platform PIS) put a “X” If it doesn’t apply (eg: AWS on Schnellfahrstreke) put “N/A” this would also help to get bug reports reduced down to issues rather than misunderstandings and get bug reports in for things that aren’t working as intended when stated in this spreadsheet some suggested features that I think would be appropriate for this include but are not limited to; skybox Platform pis Class 166 automatic front number displays Off world destinations for pis (platform and on train pis) In cab operating pis In cab automatic pis Rush hour passengers Route changing/recognised in cab pis water texture upgrades Livery designer compatibility Safety system operatable (each type) Automatic train pis recognition of service number Certain updated sounds (eg: M7 Horn) Systems similar to AFB
People would take this as a promise to make those features, the same as they do idle comments of Matt's (or even confirmed "We'll look at this" from Matt), ie would cause some people a few problems
sounds quite silly that people get problems because dovetail states what’s in their game Edit: also as my suggestion was only for intended already implemented features, would it be so controversial to ask dovetail things like “does MSB have LZB ?” or “did you decide to go for an automatic set up for this locos PIS?” or “how come I can change the livery of a class 101 not my 166 ?”
