While browsing the Tech reports i found this statement from DTG: "...If it's been logged it will be considered but there are a lot of requests for improvements and fixes to wade through so we have to work through these in a triage fashion..." I would love to see the process behind. I think a basic functionallity, like sound, light, behaviour, should not be considered only, but should be fixed. Cosmetic-, Simulation-Level-, Rant-, "i cant move my train"- issues are important, but what is the priority ? E.g. I have purchased a loco which i am not happy with because of a light issue. Yes, during night and in tunnels it is an issue. I have sent a ticket. The ticket was closed because the issue is known, but i have no idea if somebody "waded trough" and skipped it in a triage fashion. If this is the case, i consider it wasted money and delete the DLC, but dont expect me to buy another loco instead. There are 50 pages of Tech reports. Is it just me ? I would like to know what happens to a DLC mentioned above. 50 pages, 3 plattforms, announcements, Roadmaps,... It seems organized, but i am afraid it´s not. I dont want to blame anybody, i am looking for a better transparency and a kind of matrix in terms of routes and locos.
