Track Not Continuous - Content Or Engine

Discussion in 'Technical Reports' started by triznya.andras, Sep 7, 2024.

  1. triznya.andras

    triznya.andras Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2019
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    2,794
    Just reporting this because I can ;) and it's a bit suspicious that it might happen due to a small engine change, such as rounding. Better safe than sorry. (Using production build)

    On my last run northbound from Johnstown to Altoona, this time on freight main, I noticed a warning, and since free roams have no pressure, I drove safe and responsibly and stopped.
    I can't explain why the game thinks that the rails end ahead, in that I don't see any gap (not even a typical elevation glitch which is continuous, just makes the driver fall out of the seat).
    I suspect this is old, with scenarios typically avoiding it, but at the same time really weird that you'd have a gap on the main (fine, new PDL has electricity gap, too).

    Not an issue in that it made a semi-snoozing run into a scenario (stop, inspect, adapt) and I could circumvent it by switching to the passenger main and continuing as usual.

    Anyway, the pictures:
    20240907110101_1.jpg 20240907110118_1.jpg 20240907110236_1.jpg 20240907110318_1.jpg 20240907110325_1.jpg
    It's Horseshoe Curve in Summer and I took the long train just out of Johnstown, but I assume it's best to replicate with the one that starts in Johnstown.
     
  2. Spikee1975

    Spikee1975 Guest

    This spot has always been a problem with HSC it seems - it's not related to the core updates. (Also not to 32 / 64 bit). It's a flaw in tracks.bin.

    I have just tested it on build v72.3 (pre core updates), it is the same. Some route building wizard may repair it by splitting and welding again? (There's a remaster out there I think which also adds the missing superelevation...)

    My answer is: CONTENT problem.

    TS Classic 2022 (v72.3b)
    2024-09-07 13_17_30-Train Simulator (x64).png
    2024-09-07 13_17_21-Train Simulator (x64).png

    Edit: I've even tested it on TS 2013 - same here :D
    2024-09-07 13_48_00-.png
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2024
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  3. Spikee1975

    Spikee1975 Guest

    I think they left it in this state as scenarios were already existing. Fixing this could break compatibility, so scenario authors found their way round this spot. You could, as a minor "fix", add some static workers here - "under construction" :)
     
  4. triznya.andras

    triznya.andras Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2019
    Messages:
    2,333
    Likes Received:
    2,794
    That makes sense, too.
    Indeed, the scenarios I recall about this area usually switch me and have some stationary trains, stalled or else.
     
  5. cunningn#3154

    cunningn#3154 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2023
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    298
    Might it even be possible that it was a deliberate ploy by some developer to add 'interest' with broken track that got left in when they productionised it?
     
  6. Spikee1975

    Spikee1975 Guest

    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page