Train Livery’s In Service Mode

Discussion in 'TSW General Discussion' started by AtherianKing, Dec 30, 2020.

  1. AtherianKing

    AtherianKing Guest

    Is their a way to keep my liveries i’ve created but not see AI trains driving them, it just looks weird on LGV seeing my GWR Duplex on the line
     
  2. Yosh1saurus

    Yosh1saurus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2020
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    31
    Don't think you can stop the ai driving the liveried trains
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 1
  3. stujoy

    stujoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2019
    Messages:
    6,985
    Likes Received:
    18,675
    This is one of the main reasons I haven’t bothered with livery designer. There is no way of turning a livery on or off. Nothing breaks the immersion of driving on a route more than a livery that doesn’t fit or even worse an unfinished livery. As I’m not that skilled at making liveries, any that I make are best kept hidden.
     
    • Helpful Helpful x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  4. FD1003

    FD1003 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2019
    Messages:
    2,662
    Likes Received:
    3,966
    As far as my experience goes, your liveries only populate the route on LGV and SPG, if anyone has experience with how it works on HMA and IoW let me know.

    On SKA I've never encountered any of my liveries (2 for the Talent, and 3 for the BR406), never created a livery for the Class 483.

    Anyway I think we need an option for how ofter the train with our livery spawns, for example:

    -One off (no AI will spawn with your train if you choose to run with that livery, maybe slim chance of an AI spawing with it if you use any other livery).

    -Normal (As it is now)

    -Common Place (A very high percentage of the trains will spawn with your livery), this could be used for example if you want to slightly change the era the route is set(I.E. if you want all your TGVs to be in Atlantique), or you update the livery with a more modern version (I.E. Green/White 442, Island Line 483), but I suspect it would require a big core change
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2021
    • Helpful Helpful x 1

Share This Page