After long time waiting the day will finally come Took me a while to figure out all needed stuff and this is gonna be first test version. Im not gonna distribute merged route like an .pak, non of the files will be distributed (only the ones which i created) but you will be still able to enjoy it... are you asking how ? Well i worked many hours to figure out how to distribute merged route and i finally found a solution... I made a installer which will do all hard work for you (that work which takes me ages Everything will be happening on your drive (basically like steam patching) and in the end it will make new .pak with standalone route so you will still be able to play standalone Trenton and LIRREX routes. Merged route is not distributed with merged timetable !! If there will be timetable then it will be just test one to drive the whole route, not a traffic around. But nothing will stop you to create your own timetables or create some scenarios in scenario planer. And just remember, this is like proof of work concept to see if that will really work... and if that will be successful then Morristown will be added next
Looking forward to see where this will lead to. Hopefully this can be applied to other routes in the future. Quite an impressive start. Mike.
Indeed. And kind of debunks DTG who have always seemed to put route merges in the too difficult if not altogether impossible basket.
Would the installer be easily working under Proton (possibly with use of Steam Tinker Launch), without extensive native library overrides or installing things that don't want to cooperate with Wine/Proton?
Exactly. Trainsimcz has proved on occasions that what DTG said can't be done, actually.... can be done!
This is genuinely fantastic -- thank you so much for taking the time and effort to do this. I'll be downloading this on day 1 for sure. If this ends up a success, I can't wait to see the Morristown line added (and the Stamford services when those release, if you're so inclined). I'm in awe.
To be fair to DTG - I don't think its the merging of the maps that have made that statement be given. I think its always been on the merging of the timetables (or eras) - neither of which is being done here. That said - this is a great piece of work - and I'm interested to see where it goes.
This is some good news for PC players. Going to be a pain to create new timetables for stuff like this, but glad to see it´s possible.
It's good news that it's feasible. Indeed, the problem will be creating new, huge timetables. And we'll have to see how it works regarding performances as well... In the medium term, it's good to have merges like that, as we had in TS. But in the very long term, when we will have dozens of adjacent routes, I think we would need to find something other than merges as a solution to truly build a network...
DTG said the same thing about working CCTV on trains too and then a third party comes along and does it for us. Gives me hope that another third party team will soon join TSW and focus on more underground routes because we know DTG don’t really want to touch that neither…
Yes, it's indeed a good sign that even 3rd party developpers can bring new features to the game, and not just DTG.
Simply put DTG clearly don’t have the skill set to achieve what ‘modders’ can….first the blurry textures issue courtesy of Firefly and now this.
You can't say that, only they can modify the core of the game. But whether they want to do it in relation to what it costs and what it brings in, that's another question...
If the average machine can handle the load, this will be great. But, unless a realistic functioning timetable becomes available (can't imagine the man-hours needed), I suspect it will remain a proof of concept.
Well if they were to merge two routes they wouldn’t merge the timetable rather build a new one which would not be that hard, otherwise trains would just stop at the limits of the original routes. They’d have to be told it was now one big route.
Trouble is most of the London Underground routes are all Automatic now so not worth there while. Only manual lines left are Bakerloo we already have Piccadilly line Waterloo and city line. everything is fully or partial automatic.
No reason to make new one if you can just remove portal node from timetable and continue that service where it suppose to go
If the answer is no, then we would need to do something other than a merge to achieve the same result... We could place markers on the tracks at the end points that would teleport us directly to the next route (a kind of automatic portal). We would have a loading screen, but there would be no impact on performance. Route hopping 2.0...
Wow, so you were serious about this? Haha. I saw the messages on Discord yesterday. This is awesome!!! If New York - Stamford could be merged with this, it would make this route an all time fan favorite!
