Search Results

Again, most of the services in the present-day timetable are present on the route. The line is a lot quieter post-COVID.

Again, most of the services in the present-day timetable are present on the route. The line is a lot quieter post-COVID.

Just as a reminder, most of the services in the real timetable are present in the route: Current timetable

Don't know. But looking at streams that show the timetable services pretty much all the services in the actual timetable seem to be there.

DTG's work also tends to have fairly frequent spelling and grammar errors. Mind you, I've seen the same sort of thing in AAA games - copyediting...

Aha, I believe I have discovered why the timetable is so sparse: it's based on the current post-COVID timetable: Current timetable

I wonder if high levels of cloud cover leading to the elimination of shadows will ever be fixed. I presume it isn't inherent to Unreal...

General practice seems to be at DTG to lay more track than might end up in the final route - presumably this is so if they do end up having the...

But also deadlines are not set magically. Giving the team more time is also an option.

Their point is that because they do not own E2G there are no services loaded for that section of track, since those services use the 385.

I don't think you understood what they were talking about.

Well, the bigger problem is that said vague language usually means they're not doing it.

Does the extra track really eat up performance?

Here: RB44 (Scroll down and click on the two "KBS 944" links) RB54 RB58

This completely blows Raildriver out of the water. Detent plates are a genius idea.

Is this satire?

They do have the power, and have released many substandard releases of their own.

TSW5 would be a great way to fix features added in TSW4? Are you hearing yourself?

All of which were on a route-specific basis and so could have been added to TSW2... You're forgetting a very important reason: money.

I don't think you can complain about a "buy it now and fix it later" approach when you reward it by pre-ordering.

At the same time you'll find many who say "gameplay over graphics". Unfortunately with the poor timetable Fife Circle falls down on that front,...

Are you sure this will work?

Can you clarify how precisely the timetable "loops"?

IIRC foot crossings are not required to be protected by whistle boards in some circumstances.

But compare the TSW "rebrands" with the TSC rebrands...

This is complete nonsense. If DTG was barely keeping its head over water Focus would not buy them.

Er, how do you work that out?

From what I've seen, not to the level that would require any sort of information that isn't publicly available.

I don't think the console manufacturers have that level of influence...

Well I'd imagine that the work on the EWS 08 was reused for the BR 08...

So, since you're someone who presumably knows a bit about how Simugraph works, do you know if it's possible to add new types of nodes or are you...

Not including Grand Central would be a bit of an own goal in my opinion - the line there is entirely in tunnel, so it's not like it would impose...

I just thought it was a very odd opinion.

Then why go off on a rant about how they shouldn't give teasers?

...that has nothing to do with my point.

Conversely, there is the need to show that progress is being made. Considering that it looks likely that most of the stuff that they said would be...

Personally I'm more concerned about the unfinished steam simulation...

Timelapse of the Long Beach branch for anyone wondering what it's like: [MEDIA] Of course, the key question is if the signalling will be accurate...

Have you posted a thread explaining the issue in detail?

Wouldn't it make the most sense to share asset packs on the trainsimcommunity site, since that's where everyone's uploading their mods?

It's based on real events on preserved railways.

The problem is, DTG's behaviour has been such that "looking into it" pretty much means "not going to be fixed".

Of course for some people the fact that it's a fictionalised compressed version of Europe ruins that for them.

Just because you haven't been sued, doesn't mean you're not breaking the law.

As far as I'm aware Richard Armstrong isn't a trademark lawyer.

Er, that isn't a means for you to shut down any disagreement.

You just contradicted yourself. And is there anybody who doesn't want the logos? That proves absolutely nothing. I presume the people granting...

For starters, you can infringe trademarks even if you aren't making a profit. Second, any lawyer arguing that making the branding patches separate...

AP are almost certainly breaking the law by doing this.

That's exactly the sort of thing I'm looking for, great!