[ATTACH] A freight train leaves Cheyenne in the morning rain. Route: Cheyenne 1869 Locomotive: Union Pacific 119 (though you can only see its...
I strongly doubt that a scenario editor with the capabilities of TSC would require any licensing.
There would be no information overload if the explanations were placed in a separate "Advanced Features Tutorial".
It feels odd having the ability to use the handbrake if the only way to actually use it while moving is to use the external camera view with the...
I think it should be a basic expectation of any game that all its features are explained either in the game or in the manual.
I don't think it provides enough guidance on activating and using the more advanced realistic features like AWS though.
Cold starts are great, but the game doesn't make enough use of them.
That would be solved if TSW had a robust scenario editor like TSC has.
I'd say the biggest downside to Zusi is the fact that it's limited to Germany... Though on that note, it would be nice if there were some other...
I don't think that's enough. I think what is needed is a deliberate process of choosing routes that provide the maximum potential for service variety.
If they try and charge us for a non-existent upgrade...
Such objections only make sense if you assume multiplayer would be mandatory, and I see no reason why it would. Of course, you could still object...
I understand why DTG placed the 1972 on platform 6 - it's intended to represent a Central line train. But they missed a trick. Rather than...
Are you saying that at present the auto fireman draws from an infinite supply of coal and water?
And if not, what's the point of the refueling tutorial?
Ffestinog and Welsh Highland Railways (Present Day) This is, frankly, the obvious choice for a preserved route - while with TSC there is the...
Forget that, give us Liverpool to Manchester 1830!
Separate names with a comma.
