Search Results

There is with the Littlehampton to Eastbourne/Ore services (don't know if there are others). SEHS also has this (usually the depot runs).

Also, there are 3 variants of the 168 which would be cool to have.

They'll do a smashing job with it. It's not that hard to model, and it had a distinctive sound.

What people seem to fail to understand, is that Fife Circle is being developed by Rivet. Skyhook is updating their EMT 158 to a ScotRail one for...

I think the Fife Circle thing is more to do with 2 3rd parties than anything to do with DTG.

The HST was already in game with GWE but you had to pay again for the EMT one because they aren't the same, why should the 158 be any different.

So, want a story? Did a Liverpool to Crewe service with a Runcorn stop (11.30). A messy start, couldn't get the regulator and cut off right, but...

There's always the past ;). Granted licenses are still needed, but as DTG have the BR license it shouldn't be too difficult.

Actually, it does matter if a route was created for TSW2, because any loco DLCs released for it and before require their home route, compared to...

Ideally also with a 745/755 for variety's sake. It's not too long, although the London end may be a bit difficult to capture.

If nothing in TSW worked, then it is really a mystery why people still play this game (of which there are many on these forums). I certainly...

The TSW compatible bit means they can be used with any TSW game after the one they were released for. They are listed with the game they came with...

OHLE is one of those things I only notice if pointed out by someone else or if I'm looking for it, otherwise it is just one of those things that...

Skyhook is developing the 158, yes.

Not all the time, their IOW route (original, not 2022 as I don't own that one) is a good route for its time :) and still holds well even now I think.

Can we please have working PIS on all trains full stop? That's the question that really needs asking.

Why am I seeing mention of a prospective Spanish route along with an apparently already existing but not there multiplayer in the same sentence?

It's called shrinkflation, and DTG are far from the only guilty party.

Ideally the route should have gone Peterborough to York anyway, the 225 as a DLC.

I like the 465 as that's the one I drive a lot.

They can't show up, but surely they have procedures in place and can make arrangements. Saying something may happen that'll stop them is a stupid...

Late trains is down to poor management. Compared to many on this thread who confuse that with laziness. And refrain from telling people to grow...

It's only for 8th gen. 9th gen should have all layers if the relevant DLC is installed.

BML has a reduced timetable. On the reduced timetable the HST AI layer, Class 66, Class 375 and Class 166 layers are absent.

The Class 20, being a pre-TSW3 release, needs the route it was intended for installed as well.

Some services on some routes already have this as part of their timetable.

From what I've heard, there are significant differences between the EMT 158 and ScotRail 158 to justify them as completely different.

Every business is lazy then. All they do is look to maximise profits with as little effort as possible. Also, we have no idea what goes on behind...

Driving with just the reverser sounds like a fu challenge. Watch this space...

They do whatever they think will make them the most money, which at this point seems to be making short, one train routes and once finished move...

To be fair I only really stick to SEHS anyway, with all add ons. Probably why I consider TSW to be complete given that route has a busy timetable...

The setting should be clearly labelled something along the lines of "traction lock indicator"

There's enough for me.

But many of the routes I play are the complete opposite, there's enough in them for them to not be bare.

Its not negative, its realistic. They've only recreated a route from scratch once, not likely to do it again.

BML actually uses 377/1s, as some are numbered so. But they are identical to the /4s which I don't think is the case in real life.

But that argument applies to all routes, not just US ones.

They're having trouble with US content. That's the simple answer.

I mean, it is possible, and they've done it once already. The chances of them doing it a second time, however, are next to none.

They can't just create a British route or German route either. There's a lot more to them than just deciding to make one and release it in month,...

The part between Reading and London Paddington will not be recreated for the Elizabeth Line. If anything, it would remaster the current GWE route...

Surely there's something more productive that would yield better results you could do. Can't imagine those tickets have done anything :D

I see we have the Weasley twins out and about :D

Fully support this. Would mean we don't have to search for those runs I enjoy (and on a busy timetable like SEHS or BML it is handy).

It may because they manage the stations along the line, which would mean they bear responsibility for everything to do with them.

Could have swore mine hasn't changed from what I set it at.

I think he's asking for a steam railtour in SEHS for Flying Scotsman, not a steam based timetable.

There's complaining and giving feedback, and there's calling them lazy.

It'll have probably been in the license that the name of the line is changing.

I am, but quite often I'm waiting a couple of hours for one to come. Even then, half the time I can't get on it before it goes to be fuelled.