Search Results

Not even close.

TSW2 brought the most ambitious route: London Commuter. TSW3 brought an extended SEHS and added a bunch of DLC to it. By far the route with the...

If they really wanted to, they could create more locos and such for routes. They simply choose not to. Nothing to do with development time.

Perfectly valid. We each have our own preferences.

Don't speak too soon.

Yes and no. It should have gone to York. At least it makes more sense than ending the WCML at Milton Keynes.

I think this thread has just become a sort of discussion thread.

So they obviously didn't factor substitutions in then. Makes sense.

BCC is similar, no? It's the same as those you've mentioned.

It's actually the opposite.

For some reason it appeared in my inbox that you quoted this from me. Weird as I never said that.

Will shouting from the rooftops work?

To Milton Keynes is too short, though, and most Avanti services skip it so its a stupid place to end the route.

You're probably right on that one.

Nothing wrong with that. I only got the 700 to be AI anyway, I've played hardly any services with it.

The ECML and WCML are two completely separate routes.

The Class 700s is the boring part.

In TSW you can explore the route, TSC you can't.

He said: based on the title of this thread.

TSW offers freedoms you could only dream of in TSC. That's what makes it better.

This suggestion is for decals. Might want to create a specific thread for your suggestion.

That surely can't be their reasons. Corridors would only be used if we were able to.

Not including the 390 would be the same as GWE without the HST. Boring.

It would make the RHTT a not so pointless DLC.

Tell me, though, would you really enjoy a route if the trains for it were LOVE. I think not.

Because they could have set it in the past instead of the boring modern day?

I was thinking more in the way some of the issues present then are still here now. I would have thought they would have eliminated most of them...

The only way I can see Lumo in TSW is if we get Newcastle to Edinburgh, otherwise it doesn't make any sense to include a new train and paint it...

It would be their own fault then wouldn't it for releasing DLC with bugs and not fixing them.

Best to ignore him, he's a obvious troll.

Ah, but if people turn from TSW to TSC and vice versa, one would be less profitable.

Because they don't just recreate routes from TSC in TSW. If they did, then most routes that have appeared in Train Simulator would be here already.

Given that I've had to clean literal human waste on toilets before, it certainly is something I wouldn't enjoy.

Eh, they just don't appeal to me. The A4s are the only steam locos that look good streamlined.

All I'm taking from this is that they haven't learned much.

They are ugly.

Yet another passenger issue, I see. When will this end?

They don't even need to open up the full route, but rather a sample of what could be.

I didn't realise the 801 has a speed set, but this probably explains it.

TSW could have the base game free with the training centre and a rotating sample of trains each time you load the game.

True, both are needed.

So do SEHS, BPO etc.

I don't even want to know what the gameplay is like.

He has done that on at least 3 other threads.

Because most gameplay would result in using ATO.

BPo is probably the best route. Anyway, probably a troll. All he's done is spam other suggestions with his preferences for this or similar routes.

Is it me, or are you spmming these suggestions with your own preferences.

Southeastern High Speed is one of the best. Jsut ignore the (imo minor) issued.

Are you not interested in any routes? Because there are also those from previous titles that can be used with TSW4.

As I said earlier