there is also that gigachad creator who is attempting to re-create pretty much all of London's railways... mad, but looking great atm :) I...
as I have said many times - more German / Austrian content / locos => happy railfan me :D
very good suggestion... once we know what DTG are aiming at in near future, we might offer suggestions that might actually get done :)
that train strongly reminds me of Camel Hump formation trains that run on Wien - St. Polten (old Westbahn corridor), just with that added US heavy...
looks sleek and nice, how fast and nimble is it?
sounds great :)
all these contemplations in this thread are nice, but lets get back to the very basics - TGV Duplex is a pretty damn good train, and it is still...
for me it is actually a good thing, I dont have to look for switches if I return to the route after a longer time :)
TSW might not be 1:1 in terms of every single building or tree as IRL, but it is 1:1 in terms of track length and such, as far as I know
branches and different routings are so much fun :)
I would welcome a route with both TVM and KVB involved... I like the challenge of the transition as well :)
I loved LGV Mediterranee, the train is gorgeous... and soooo loooong... looks great when doing camera 8 fly-bys :D ... would love a chance to...
I have just noticed that the ICE 3 on Munchen Augsburg doesnt display current on the left display, which is kinda weird[ATTACH] it displays...
ooooh ok... weird, but ok :D
sounds awesome, but how do you set up stuff when in formation with 112? neither has MU switch
I believe there is a lot of German content fans who crave this loco a lot, me among them :D
more German content is always welcome by me :)
today it has bugged out on me tho, no amount of double pressing A can get it to go off, I guess it is just a temporary bug
all I can say this sounds great :)
as I dont have Blackpool nor Birmingham, or Cathcart... I really like London Commuter and SEHS for the amount of paths/options of routings to...
oh god pls sth a bit faster than 166 :D
This is not a big or game-breaking bug, but I still noticed it - 16:01 IC service bound for Riesa, loco BR 101... in the HUD I noticed that speed...
oh ok, I mainly got confused as to why the default is called "Trail" :D
what is this auxillary control for anyway? I mean, there is Trail, Automatic and a couple other options... and... are they usable/functioning or...
I have just noticed it today as I was preparing my loco for the run... so auxiliary control in BR 103 is in fact sth like AFB in disguise? then...
Leipzig is enough to make my railfan inside drool :D
sounds promising :)
would drive it if it made it into the game tho :)
looks like an ugly child of BR class 66 and Stadler 9000 if it had gone back in time :D
Free Roam though has a number of experience-breaking bugs - lets say when it comes to German/Austrian routes that have neutral sections, in Free...
most of neutral sections work as they should, but they dont work correctly in Free Roam... from newer locos tho, OBB 1116 Taurus doesnt recognise...
I feel kinda dumb for bumping my own thread, but I kind off found out that the issue is with BR 442, somehow on Dresden Riesa it doesnt really...
Update June 11th: Tried more RE50 services with 442s, same issue - +35 with everything set up right (I think)... tried then with Dostos, and it...
Does/should PZB bridging count as safety system? Or what am I missing here? It is frustrating to really play the service to the best of your...
So I turned on this R50 service, Riesa-bound, 5:14, with a double-traction BR 442 (Talent 2)... turned everything on, safety systems, lights of...
a 13yr old in me cant get over the name Cockfosters :D
when loading the game from Steam, the loading screen got stuck early on, so I tried validating files first, didnt help... then I did restart my PC...
LZB doesnt work correctly mostly on older/regional locos like 112/146... but at least atm they are at a point where it at least releases from LZB...
this is just a rhetorical question cos I'm pretty impressed with stuff in here - when can I drive on this :)))) ?
Separate names with a comma.