Extremely wishful thinking. DTG have shown no signs of changing their "fire and forget" attitudes to releasing and patching content.
What on Earth are you on about?
The timetables for both Peak Forest and SOS are inaccurate, and it's not just missing services. For starters, those were choices DTG made. The...
Elaborate.
The option is Hud & Gameplay > Scenario Marker.
Go for Youtube, it's the only video host this site supports embedding.
Thanks a lot, your work is amazing! You've really gone above and beyond what I expected from a Jubilee/4F update and added a ton of extra stuff as...
You assume they have a choice!
It's worth remembering that TSW1 is as old today as TSC was when TSW1 released...
So yet more money required to be spent to get fixes for game-breaking bugs.
Consider when TSC released. Consider when TSW released. A pattern may be about to form.
Are you thinking of Denshattack, which was revealed but not released recently? [MEDIA]
They very clearly used ChatGPT for the post in the Announcements forum as well...
The ship has only sailed because DTG says it has. The logical way of looking at it is that DTG is refusing to incorporate fixes.
Frankly that's too kind to DTG - plenty of game breaking bugs don't get fixed.
So we have to pay for bug fixes. Lucky us.
You do understand what crowdfunding is, right?
Who the hell is going to pay without an assurance that if enough money is raised something will happen?
You do not buy games on GeForce Now. You buy a subscription to GeForce Now that allows you to play the games you already own on Steam/Epic/etc on...
I would financially support a crowdfunded steam DLC if it meant the steam simulation was finished - but we've never been given the chance.
I was confused by what your point was.
Not for the Tadami Line!
In practice, no. This is why I am very slowly building up a list of bugs in a Google Sheet, so that it can serve as a reminder of how many bugs...
No, it was said in this news article. Youtube channels that don't link their sources disgust me.
They have erected - aided and abetted by the rest of the community - an absurdly expensive barrier to entry for UK content.
Frankly, AP has done great damage to TSC.
Do we have to have these same old "DTG can do no wrong, it's all the customer's fault" posts based on no evidence? [Citation needed]
I don't believe DTG's excuse.
You assume that the only way for DTG to make money off annual releases is expanding the playerbase!
I haven't seen any signs the annual release is bringing new players in.
Not to mention NTP is filled with bugs - I don't think they've ever fixed the Mk2 coaches and oil tankers having borked numbers.
Why a response to this thread and not the ones raising issues?
DTG have not proven themselves averse to inconsistent features in the past! This was the excuse used for no announcements in the past as well.
Indeed you can't import your profile if you don't have the files on your computer.
Don't expect an answer from DTG if it's a complaint!
TSC doesn't support differential speed limits IIRC.
Where is this?
Well, I'll believe the future phases when I see them.
Can't be an unreasonably high number, though...
Hardly different to DTG then!
Well yes, that was my point. Of course, each loco will only have a few scenarios where it's playable...
Hypothetically there could be route-specific interactions that cause issues. However, that's already a potential issue with layering.
Hence why "have" was in quotation marks!
But they already "have" to test every version of 146 on every timetable in appears in.
I'm fairly certain that wasn't the case!
They didn't delist the original LIRR, though.
They're in the route .pak file, but are separate within that .pak file.
I strongly doubt there will be any rerouting.
Exactly. DTG promises fixes, never delivers them, then says nothing on the topic.
Well, it could make full-length runs of both the Metro-North routes...
Separate names with a comma.
