Some people just like to argue for the sake of it I guess.
I second this. They've done it for loco DLCs, why not extend it to all trains instead? Can't be that hard.
I think they're ugly, but that goes to most modern trains nowadays.
I very much doubt they developed the route, the trains for the route, without talking to the companies involved first. They want to make money,...
Are we really complaining about something being free? I thought paid core updates were the problem.
The license was revoked last minute for an undisclosed reason.
Or (and I know this will never happen but one can dream) develop more steam routes.
Need more detail about the route, rolling stock, major landmarks, service patterns etc.
The answer to your question isn't a yes or no.
But safety systems don't have to be on (unless of course the route is LIRR). All that needs to be done is master key in, reverser to forwards and...
You can only market one game so much.
You all really need to have lower expectations for this sort of thing.
I hope not.
Erm, you can.
For what?
More like do they even take testers feedback into account?
I see a problem for consoles, which make up a big part of the TSW player base
Here's an idea: just don't buy it.
Licensing is the first thing I look at, so I doubt they created the route before asking for a license.
There could be many reasons why. Might not even be because of anything to do with TSW for all we know.
I wonder how many of those who went for the fourth option were being serious.
GWE also has a scenario around this (I think, not touched the route for years), and didn't ask for their branding to be removed, so doubtful
BML only includes Queenstown Road
The only problem is that I now notice the difference when I drive a train without suspension. It really adds to the immersion
Given the complexity of the London area, I'd say if we had Waterloo, then we wouldn't have the branches.
That is a completely different game altogether, with completely different goals and audiences. Also, why a poll?
It's because, even though they're the same, they're technically different.
The remastered Cathcart is set 2019 (or 2024 can't remember which) I believe.
If you're an achievement hunter, a simulator isn't the game for you.
If that was the case we wouldn't be allowed to drive trains full stop.
If we keep asking for extensions for routes that are nowhere near ready for release, we're not going to get anywhere
It should appear regardless of the timetable used (the TGV is the only removed layer).
Or, people say yes, then make more pointless polls around similar issues. End result being a forum full of polls saying should this or that be fixed.
It's a closed poll which doesn't give much choice. Given the poll is about fixing the NYT signalling (which I couldn't care for and did ignore the...
If you add the valley lines it'd no longer be the Cardiff City lines.
I'd say no unless we get Greater Anglia, which at the moment (and for the foreseeable future) isn't going to happen. We have enough empty...
They're locos, not decals.
?? There's nothing here.
Way too long.
As with your other suggestion, add more. (It's also "Dovetail" not "Dovel").
A lot more detail needed here.
They want to make it a core feature. When they will do that is another question. Rivet has already done this on their most recent routes.
The problem lies with licensing.
They should have started with a small route with a tank engine or two instead of a main line route. But, alas, they've decided no more steam.
Could we maybe go to Oban so we have opportunity for end to end runs, or do some trains terminate at Crianlarich as well?
I see we have yet another poll that tries to swing in the favour of "yes".
Seems steam isn't as uneconomical as Beeching thought.
They've said no to a subscription model.
Nowhere have I talked about LIRR. I couldn't care at all for US stuff.
Separate names with a comma.
