Search Results

The "variety" comes from it being more than a simple A to B, unlike most other routes. There are very few TSW routes that are like this. Closest...

Everything I've bought (with exceptions, although they're rare) have always been good value for money as far as I'm concerned. I'm happy with...

Can we stop with this Rivet obsession? It's getting a bit ridiculous name-dropping them when even the slightest thing on any route is out of...

Possibly the case. Could be the reason we've got more "casual" stuff in TSW lately, they could have been testing whether it'd be a good market or not.

Testing isn't the problem. It's whoever tests these things being listened to that is the problem. As far as management are probably concerned,...

Fix one thing, break another.

Occurs on the 377 (London Commuter version) and 801 (5-car, probably 9-car as well although only the 5-car ones couple to each other) as well. The...

Can I just say I like the way you've structured this.

Whenever it's finished. It's a passion project, so will be ready when it's ready. Probably by summer time we'll have it.

To note, on the 377 (London Commuter version) and the 801, taillights also are on between two coupled units (this was before we got the 350).

Better yet, remaster the Tees Valley route and extend it to Bishop Auckland.

Darlington to Newcastle is weird, more so than Peterborough to Doncaster. Best thing to do is extend the current one to York and then another...

Which train? Scenario or free roam?

1700 tons is a lot of pulling power.

Then I have no idea unfortunately. As I said above, works fine for me.

Eh, the focus isn't really DMU commuter runs so it doesn't bother me.

The LNWR license issue was likely because of the leak. Seems too coincidental that they revoked it at the same time. I presume there was some sort...

Works fine for me on Series X. What platform are you on? If on PC, try removing any mods installed (if any) and see if you have the same problem....

Why is there so much focus on length? Quality over quantity, as it should be. Length isn't everything, nor should it be. Quality sells, quantity...

OP's name sounds familiar...

What's weird is that this roadmap has been out for a week, yet the Q&A for it is still open. For one, it's outdated. For two, there's many...

I'm all for modern as it's all I know. However, when done right, older time periods work better.

I always crouch to pretend I'm sitting. Then some rude NPC decides to sit on me.

It's worth the money. Decent length, decent trains (many layers from other routes), decent timetables (there's never a dull moment and there's...

No idea why that's happening. I don't have a purple square where it says Continue journey.

Nope. Not happening. They extended it once (this route was originally released for TSW2 but without the Ebbsfleet to Ashford and Dartford to...

The steam railtours (the driveable ones) run from June to December.

They've already ruled it out. Although, that said, it's still a possibility at some point.

I wonder if that's feasible. I can imagine the PIS is set up in such a way that it will always act like a train will turn up even when it won't.

Might as well stop wasting your breath reminding them. More likely to get blood out of a stone. I console myself by knowing their 150 is 1000x worse.

The appeal to me, is that it is the only major route out of London that is not electrified, and one of the few operators that use push-pull haulage.

Big stations such as York, Newcastle etc would be great candidates. As will any major London station.

Updating those two routes would certainly make me purchase them. They're two routes I just never got round to, but now the chances of me buying...

Give it one or two years and that may change. We never thought GWE was going to be touched again, yet it was. Albeit it was a passion projec though.

I'll say Doncaster to Leeds, with the 331 and IC225. Both can layer onto ECML, as well as layering from a potential Northern 150/2 (although only...

We may do in the future. But then this timetable would need to be built with those in mind, which I doubt will happen.

I wonder... WCML Shap has reduced layers on Series S, while Series X retains them. Would the same thing be possible here?

OK?

Steam, looks like.

They were talking about the Series S (confirmed in another thread, or this one). Nothing has changed on PS5 (unverified, I don't own one) or...

Hmm. Weird. Although I have only been driving the 9 car one, mainly doing York or Edinburgh runs. Issue with the 5 car variant maybe?

Did you go through Stratford? That was causing me problems, maybe it still does, I wouldn't know, I've been driving the 465 lately.

Never said they did. But they're still there, and are on every route they should be. Having passengers at a station, regardless of...

PS5 and Xbox Series X are unaffected (I think PS5 is anyway, haven't seen anything saying otherwise). Only Xbox Series S is affected.

I was on ECML earlier and it ran fine on Series X. In fact I've visited the route a few times this week and it's ran fine each time.

I think asking for the line to Grantham would be too much. Don't see why an extension to Sheffield and the Matlock branch can't be done though.

On all routes, or some? I have most of the UK ones and they work fine for me.

On console, I don't think you can undo or block updates (unless there's something I don't know?) I think you can on PC though. Can't remember the...

Simtrack. But from what I can gather, we won't see it any time soon.

All the more reason we need a route in East Anglia. The GEML is screaming for attention.