1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Route Proposal: The Denver & Rio Grande Western

Discussion in 'Suggestions' started by Blacknred81, Nov 22, 2020.

  1. Blacknred81

    Blacknred81 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2019
    Messages:
    1,052
    Likes Received:
    2,470
    So one Railroad that I think could be made for TSW is the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad, with the optimal eras for them being set from 1970's to about 1983. One reason I think this would be a good era to focus on, was the fact that the RIo Grande still ran their own Passenger trains during this time, as they did not participate in the formation of Amtrak in 1971, and held out running their own services till 1983. So this would give us some vintage US passenger services in TSW2.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    The main Passenger Service would be the Rio Grande Zephyr, which ran between Ogden and Denver (Later cut to Salt Lake City and Denver). Station stops include....
    -Denver, CO
    -Granby, CO
    -Bond, CO
    -Glenwood Springs, CO
    -Rifle, CO
    -Grand Junction, CO
    -Thompson Springs, UT
    -Green River, UT
    -Price, UT
    -Helper, UT
    -Provo, UT
    -Salt Lake City, UT
    -Ogden, UT

    Routes
    So Ideally I think there are 2 routes that could be good candidates for the Rio Grande, both on the Moffit Route.

    Soldier Summit (Provo - Helper)
    1st route would be the importation of Soldier Summit from TS2020 to TSW2. Now this route runs from Provo to Helper Utah, and covers about 69 track miles. This route could also be done 3rd party, as Skyhook games did help DTG with some of the original modeling of Soldier Summit.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    If the route length is too long, then the route could also be cut back from the Gilluly Loop Sidings near Tucker to Helper, a length of about 40 miles, but would cut out the station stop in Provo, leaving the Rio Grande Zephyr with only the station in Helper.

    Front Range (Denver - Granby)
    The 2nd route that I think could make a good location is the front range climb, from Denver to Granby Colorado. This route runs about 75 miles and would include the famous Moffat Tunnel, Big 10 Curve, as well as the opportunity to run Rio Grande's Ski Train, which ran between Denver, and Winter Park, just past the western portal of the Moffat Tunnel.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Locomotives:
    The roster for the Rio Grande should include at least 3 locomotives, 1 6 axle unit, 1 4 axle unit, and the F9. The others could be used as DLC locomotives.

    -EMD SD40T-2 (73 Units)
    [​IMG]

    -EMD SD45 (26 Units)
    [​IMG]

    -EMD SD50 (17 Units)
    [​IMG]

    -EMD GP30 (28 Units)
    [​IMG]

    -EMD GP35 (22 Units)
    [​IMG]

    -EMD GP40-2 (37 Units)
    [​IMG]

    -EMD F9 (8 total, 4 A units, 4 B units)
    [​IMG]

    Granted I know the roster and route isn't much varied from SPG or the Clinchfield, but I think the inclusion of the Rio Grande Zephyr would make this route stand out from the other 2.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2020
    • Like Like x 18
  2. JGRudnick

    JGRudnick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2019
    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    1,758
    Oh, man, A DRG&W route would be fantastic!!!
     
    • Like Like x 3
  3. Challenger3985

    Challenger3985 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    445
    Now, this is a good proposal that I can dig into for TSW. However, after reading this (don't get me wrong), it sounds like you're proposing these routes for the passenger side of the Rio Grande (which is of course the California/Rio Grande Zephyr). Which is not bad to say, since the DRGW didn't leave their part of the Zephr Train to Amtrak at the time. Just it sounds like you're in more favor of the passengers than freight (even if it's just one train through the Rockies). But, correct me if I'm wrong though.
     
  4. Blacknred81

    Blacknred81 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2019
    Messages:
    1,052
    Likes Received:
    2,470
    Its a way to get those who are not in favor of US freight routes to be on board with a route set in a mountainous terrain. I could talk about the freight side of the DRGW, but rather push the vintage passenger side of things.
     
  5. Challenger3985

    Challenger3985 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    445
    ah. I see.
    Well again, this is a great proposal. I would love to see the Rio Grande be made into TSW one day, hopefully.
    (and tbh, I do want to see the RGZ to be made as well Out of all the vintage passenger trains in the US, the CZ is my fav. Even if I'm still a freight hauler :))
     
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2020
    • Like Like x 2
  6. jedi247

    jedi247 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    831
    I'd also like to add an SD7 (5 units) or SD9 (10 units), GP7 (14 units) or GP9 (24 units), and Alco PAs (4 units)/PBs (2 units). This route needs to be added to TSW2. The scenery would be amazing from one of the dome cars on the California Zephyr or Rio Grande Zephyr.
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2020
    • Like Like x 4
  7. Zander34

    Zander34 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2020
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    5
    This would be perfect maybe it could have sw1200s
     
    • Like Like x 2
  8. Lightspeed

    Lightspeed Active Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2020
    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    103
    I’m up for a drive in vintage American stock like the F7 and F9. Makes a change from driving the GP-38s that are taking all the freight duties on American dlcs.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  9. 59321747

    59321747 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2020
    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    84
    One of you compromised to DTG’s suggested 40-mile route. Are you really so afraid that DTG will not adopt your suggestion? I think this is not the key point of the problem, but whether DTG can do it. They have their own plans, and we don’t know how much they can adopt. I have already begun to question that if the freight route is made short, it is better to develop the European route.
     
  10. OldVern

    OldVern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2020
    Messages:
    287
    Likes Received:
    347
    They could do what Trainmaster 4 did and run from Denver to just the other side of the Moffat Tunnel, Fraser I think.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Monder

    Monder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    864
    Tunnel motors and Rio Grande Zephyrs? Sign me up! I would probably go with the Denver-Granby option as it is different from TS2021 and could feature a larger variety of trains with the Winter Park specials. It is also stunning to ride a train up the climb from Denver seeing the whole city beneath you.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. ehz0689

    ehz0689 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2020
    Messages:
    65
    Likes Received:
    39
    someone gets an A for their project. the only question is licensing on DTG part
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. Monder

    Monder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    864
    If TS2021 is anything to go by, it should be fine, there are Rio Grande locos there already.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  14. aeterna

    aeterna New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2017
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    20
    Amazing suggestion, thanks dedicating your time preparing this. Lovely lovely pictures.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Blacknred81

    Blacknred81 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2019
    Messages:
    1,052
    Likes Received:
    2,470
    The Rio Grande Licensing falls under the Union Pacific so there is no issue there.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  16. steammaster4449

    steammaster4449 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2020
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    274
    Gotta say, I quite like this suggestion. I'd certainly buy this if it got put into the game.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. jedi247

    jedi247 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2018
    Messages:
    526
    Likes Received:
    831
    The SW1200 sounds good, too. D&RGW had 10 of the switchers.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  18. NSMotherSlug#881

    NSMotherSlug#881 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    118
    Nice, proposal but i don't see it happening given most of the Veterans of TSW can understand playing TSW for 2 years and we got nothing but BS from DTG. So why would you think they would give us something interesting. there's been over a couple hundred thousand votes for Horseshoe Curve since TSW that came out in 2018 and do see that in game NOPE ! what makes you thing Rio Grand is going to be in game anytime soon. DTG can't even get Santa Fe or Burlington Northern in game and there not even around anymore as a railroad.

    And lets NOT forget about Steam Locomotives where are they something EVERYONE has forgotten about Steam, isn't that the main REASON dtg made TSW2 because tsw1 couldn't do it, Yeah, Yeah !!
     
  19. Monder

    Monder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    864
    You aren't getting these... because BNSF did not give them a license for that. In one of the posts recently a majority of people said they want properly licensed trains, not unbranded ones. So BNSF, ATSF, BN etc. are not happening unless BNSF changes their licensing policy.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. NSMotherSlug#881

    NSMotherSlug#881 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2018
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    118
    Explain Clinchfield Railroad then ? yeah !
     
  21. Monder

    Monder Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2019
    Messages:
    436
    Likes Received:
    864
    What about it? Clinchfield merged into Seaboard and later CSX. CSX has provided their license as you can see with SPG. What's the point you're trying to make with CRR?
     
    • Like Like x 3
  22. steammaster4449

    steammaster4449 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2020
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    274
    Can practically hear the crack of a whip with that one.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  23. thechickencow1

    thechickencow1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2020
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    65
    This would be awesome
     
    • Like Like x 2
  24. peterg1002612

    peterg1002612 Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2019
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    13
    would like to see this route should be a challenging route to
     
    • Like Like x 2

Share This Page