I don't know who LucaZoneX is, so that means nothing without context. Why would it be "silly" think that a cargo pack would include freight services in a timetable? Isn't that what you would need to use the DLC? Since they're doing Cargo Line DLC.... an intermodal DLC would be logical. That is quite literally what was shown, so guessing what was exactly shown isn't very far off. They very well may not be from a timetable, but calling it "silly" is a ridiculous statement in itself. If anything it'd be an odd thing to do by Skyhook to post an entirely unrelated picture as a "work in progress."
Feels kind of stupid that they would take a picture this way during what is basically a teaser roadmap, but at least it has been debunked now.
Was also part of the preservation team who fixed countless pieces of route content including GWE and the 166 which are still great imo Used to be a loved fixture on the roadmap streams with Sam as well back in the day! Those were the good old days Also seems to be part of the reason MML got fixed to the standard it is at now and he's still communicating away in the feedback threads! Glad he's got a little more freedom to work on things more with SHG honestly what with everything at DTG Have a lot of respect for Adam's work!
That would have been good information to have where he was referenced. Not everyone was around during Railworks days =-)
I can still remember Lucazone telling me off on the MSTS forums for posting a full-size image in error. (Those were the dial-up days).
